Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: biff

That is my first. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote to pass a treaty. They can’t amend the Constitution with a vote on a bill. Evidently, things are going on undercover.


199 posted on 06/14/2015 8:59:18 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: odawg

By letting Obama have his TPA it virtually guarantees passage with a 51 vote.

I get so sick of the “Don’t worry Mable, we’ll cut em off at the pass next vote!” mantra. We are such suckers.


204 posted on 06/14/2015 9:02:37 AM PDT by biff (Et Tu Boeh-ner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: odawg
"That is my first. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote to pass a treaty. They can’t amend the Constitution with a vote on a bill. Evidently, things are going on undercover."

You're correct. Unfortunately, trade agreements/pacts are just that and not "treaties". NAFTA was a trade agreement. It turned out to be detrimental to our economy and jobs, as Perot warned us. My problem is with the fast-track (TPA) authority given to any president that excludes amendments and filibuster from Congress.

However, a point could be made that the USA could rarely get any trade agreements done if left to Congress and their special interests. It's a conundrum.

I don't so much believe in free trade as much as I do in fair trade.

214 posted on 06/14/2015 9:12:30 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson