Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marron

Actually I’d like some explanations from the rest of the candidates. With the exception of Rand (Zero Chance) Paul, every last one of them have actively supported and lobbied for it only to duck and let Cruz take all the fire for it. That’s pretty damn cowardly in my opinion.


35 posted on 06/13/2015 7:47:59 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad political fact. Most people prefer a popular lie over an unpopular fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
Actually I’d like some explanations from the rest of the candidates. With the exception of Rand (Zero Chance) Paul, every last one of them have actively supported and lobbied for it only to duck and let Cruz take all the fire for it. That’s pretty damn cowardly in my opinion.

I agree with you. The others are no better.

The only difference, for me, is that I wasn't interested in the others. For various reason I considered the others to be no-go's for president (though some I would have considered for vp). I've said over and over, its Cruz or Cruz, there really is no plan B for me.

Some of the other posters are demanding, "well then if not Cruz, then who?" And I don't have any answer. Who is out there taking fire on this issue? Who is prepared to go to the mat to stop this thing?

What was the hurry, that this couldn't wait until O left office?

47 posted on 06/13/2015 7:55:28 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson