ping
It seems rather obvious from article 5 that there is no need that the proposed amendment from the state legislators need be unique they are after all going to send delegates to a convention to debate, discuss, and propose amendments.
As for what they do it really wont make a difference if they don’t install some sort of State level veto on Federal domestic intrusions and abuses. Most particularly in regard tot he Federal Employees in black robes who will just as soon rewrite anything they write & we radify to whatever those federal employees personalty want.
Restoring law to a country requires having parties with an accountable and vested interest in upholding that law. Federal employees in black robes have time and time again re-demonstrated they have no more interest in the law as written and practiced for hundreds of year than they are accountable for their own radical revisions of that ‘law’ in their edicts.
If we are to be a nation of laws, they must be made accountable. The law as written cannot be allowed to change in its meaning or application until it is rewritten by the people.
A convention which wishes to restore law washington must address the corrupt abuses of the Federal ‘court’, or there will be no fruit to their labor in writing any other law.