Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz fights GOP approach on Obamacare subsidies
Politico ^ | 06/11/2015 | Manu Raju

Posted on 06/11/2015 11:02:55 AM PDT by GIdget2004

Ted Cruz is planning to battle his party over Obamacare again — this time, if Senate Republicans seek to extend subsidies that could be killed by the Supreme Court as soon as this month.

In an interview with POLITICO, the 2016 presidential candidate weighed in on the high-stakes Supreme Court case that could end subsidies for millions of people who receive their health insurance through the federal exchange. A majority of Republican senators have endorsed an approach to keep those subsidies in place until September 2017, but Cruz flatly said “no” when asked if he’d sign on as well.

“I think the best legislative option is to allow states to opt out,” Cruz said in the Capitol. “I am cautiously optimistic that the Supreme Court will conclude in King vs. Burwell that the Obama IRS disregarded the plain language of the statute and acted lawlessly. And when that occurs, it will be a real opportunity for Congress to lead.”

He added: “In a perfect world, we would take that opportunity to repeal Obamacare. At a minimum, we should allow states to opt out.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cruz; obamacaresubsidies; scotusobamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: odawg
Trump, Walker, Perry

Trump?! LOL

Walker?

SCOTT WALKER PUSHES OBAMATRADE ON EVE OF VOTE (BREITBART)

Perry?

but the fact of the matter is ... I don't think you have a heart ...

41 posted on 06/12/2015 8:12:54 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

If Scott Walker is pushing Obamatrade, then it is simple; I will never vote for him.


42 posted on 06/12/2015 8:15:19 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: odawg

To prevent a filibuster.


43 posted on 06/12/2015 12:04:38 PM PDT by nitzy (I don't vote for Republican'ts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: nitzy

No, it is to prevent discussion (analysis) or public disclosure, and so no one can mount an informed opposition.


44 posted on 06/12/2015 12:22:52 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: odawg
If that is the case, than you are right this is a travesty.

On the other hand, I think there will be a 45 day period where the agreement will be public before the 20 hour debate period.

per Wikipedia...

If the President transmits a fast track trade agreement to Congress, then the majority leaders of the House and Senate or their designees must introduce the implementing bill submitted by the President on the first day on which their House is in session. (19 U.S.C. § 2191(c)(1).) Senators and Representatives may not amend the President’s bill, either in committee or in the Senate or House. (19 U.S.C. § 2191(d).) The committees to which the bill has been referred have 45 days after its introduction to report the bill, or be automatically discharged, and each House must vote within 15 days after the bill is reported or discharged. (19 U.S.C. § 2191(e)(1).) In the likely case that the bill is a revenue bill (as tariffs are revenues), the bill must originate in the House (see U.S. Const., art I, sec. 7), and after the Senate received the House-passed bill, the Finance Committee would have another 15 days to report the bill or be discharged, and then the Senate would have another 15 days to pass the bill. (19 U.S.C. § 2191(e)(2).) On the House and Senate floors, each Body can debate the bill for no more than 20 hours, and thus Senators cannot filibuster the bill and it will pass with a simple majority vote. (19 U.S.C. § 2191(f)-(g).) Thus the entire Congressional consideration could take no longer than 90 days.

45 posted on 06/12/2015 12:55:40 PM PDT by nitzy (I don't vote for Republican'ts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson