dangerous leftists often tell you exactly what they are going to do, while the masses simply ignore it.
Remember, dangerous leftists often tell you exactly what they are going to do, while the masses simply ignore it. Mao had his little red book. Hitler had Mein Kampf. Barky had his campaign interviews.
He promised that he would “fundamentally change” the USA. He’s only been partly successful (so far.)
He promised a federal, “civilian” police force, as well armed and powerful as the military. I believe that the federal push to destroy public confidence, and sow fear of local and state police forces is a long planned strategy that the Obama regime hopes will begain a “grass root” call for federalizing the policing of communities.
There’s little doubt that the destruction of the health care system was designed to do the same thing. If the SCOTUS rules that Barky-Kare was specifically written to ONLY allow state exchanges to fund the insurance subsidies (as we all saw Gruber say was the plan all-along), they hope the masses will scream for government run, single payer health care, which Barky had promised in interviews and statements, was his plan all along, just that it would take some time.
Let’s not forget that this president is particularly petulant and more than willing to cause innocent people to feel pain, in order to force his political ideology on those who resist him. Let’s not forget how his regime put up barriers around open-air monuments in Washington, tried to keep drivers from even looking at Mt Rushmore, and even illegally closed Mount Vernon, which wasn’t a federal properly to begin with!
Mark
He wants social unrest, fear and chaos. That way he can justify his power grabs by saying he’s doing it to “ensure national stability” or some such garbage.
dangerous leftists often tell you exactly what they are going to do, while the masses simply ignore it.
Bingo.
Wealth Distribution is only partially complete.
The way the park rangers treated people wanting to visit our parks told me all I needed to know about our “public servants”.
I would amend your statement to say that he is more than willing to kill innocent people to meet his political ideology. He doesn'tkill them directly, but he puts in place programs or causes civil unrest that get people killed.