And I would sue the employees of the MSM as well as the Obama-Holder demagogues and the race-grievance industry -- they may not have "put a price on the head of the family" like the jerk mentioned in the article but they do willingly stoke the flames of hatred and revenge.
The doctrine of vicarious liability.
It's worked against white supremacist groups for influencing others (not members of the hate group) to murder minorities.
Traditional principles of vicarious liability include
Though associated with criminal law, these theories can be used to attribute fault to persons not directly related to an act that harmed a victim.
It must be proved that the others 'provided substantial assistance or encouragement' to those who did harm the victim.
In the SPLC suit against Tom Metzger and WAR the skinheads were not members of Metzger's WAR. But Metzger's rantings had influence over the mindless skinheads due to his reputation in the white supremacy movement
The aiding and abetting theory fits because
Lawyers can invoke the aiding and abetting theory with relative ease. Invoking the aiding and abetting assumes two independent actors.
To prove an aiding and abetting claim
This is a kind of an outline of information available on the Internet.
Couldn’t that SPLC precedent be used against the SPLC itself for that guy who tried to shoot up the FRC?