Isn’t it interesting that the pseudo scientists who made the discovery are attempting to get the news out, while fatidiously skating around any mention that these discoveries knock their whole “billions and billions” lash-up into a cocked hat?!
It’s always refreshing to hear the views of an eminent molecular paleontologist like yourself. Given your expertise, how do you respond to the explanations of Mary Schweitzer as to the chemical and molecular processes that allow for the preservation of certain proteins in collagen for over 145 million years? Do you think her analysis which claims that the presence of iron and the generation of free radicals that have the ability to tightly bond proteins is faulty? If so, why?
Kinda screws with the narrative the they just made it all up, doesn't it?
“Isn’t it interesting that the pseudo scientists who made the discovery are attempting to get the news out, while fatidiously skating around any mention that these discoveries knock their whole “billions and billions” lash-up into a cocked hat?!”
No one claims that dinosaurs are “billions and billions” of years old.
Which ‘pseudo scientists’ are you ranting of and what is the “whole ‘billions and billions’ lash-up” ?
Seems such a waste of time for the ‘pseudo-scientists’ to have spent all that time and money earning advanced science degrees and performing years of lab and field work when they could have just gone to Bible college instead.