Your entire meathod of argument is a lazily attempted rhetorical slight of hand.
It works like this. You make an absurd claim; "Our nation was created by Jesus Christ". I ask you to tell me where in the founding documents the name Jesus appears. Instead of answering the direct question, you tell me that I'm "limited", a "fool", need to read more history, etc. Then I get a disjointed opinion, and then I get some straw man pronouncement about which I never disagreed, like; "Jefferson believed the government should not declare a religion".
Please tell me specifically where I am incorrect about what I did say and I will address that. Please don't comment on what I didn't say. Am I incorrect that the founding documents of the country don't mention Jesus? Am I incorrect in saying that Jefferson's Bible was a heavily redacted King James Bible that removed miracle stories and references to divinity resulting in what was essentially a moral guide book?
I'm not interested in your opinions of my level of understanding or my lack of study or the darkness of my mind about which you run on and on and on.
The limits of your imagination and thinking are the problem. You set up false arguments without documentation...literally all you have offered is poor opinion. I have certainly provided you with enough material to show my argument is correct. Undoubtedly, you are set in your “opinion” and not willing to use your mind for thinking. It appears to me that you are simply going to be like a parrot and just keep repeating the same arguments.
If you do not want to believe in Jesus Christ or His influence in the creation of this nation...that is your problem...yes, it is literally a problem.
Now, you are trying to divert the discussion to a process which you wish to make up as you go so as to deflect from the evidence I have provided. That is not only insulting, it makes it difficult to really have a discussion.