Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GraceG

AMAC interested me right up to when I clicked on their “plan” for Social Security where my year group would be the first one to be fully hosed with the advance of the full retirement age to 69. Most plans I’ve seen at least exempt those over 55 but not theirs. My year group would also be hosed on the early retirement age.


22 posted on 06/08/2015 1:56:07 PM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: T-Bird45

They look to be wanting to make socialized security even more socialized. They want to redistribute even more money from those that work the hardest to those that earn the least.

IMO socialized security already does too much of that.

My hubby is 50 - if he works till 67, he’ll pay in close to $150,000 - his portion alone! Double that for his total contribution, including his employer’s portion. If he lives to 83, the average age for males, he’ll get a whopping $40,000 back for that extra $300k SS gets from him.

Our solution- quit work. We have enough saved and will work at part-time businesses we enjoy. We’ll have less stolen from us through SS and other income taxes, and can out up to $22.5k into 401ks to avoid confiscatory taxation.


40 posted on 06/08/2015 9:48:17 PM PDT by Hardens Hollow (Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson