Mr. Pratt substantiated most of his statements with excerpts from historical materials which included writings by the founders, constitutional clauses, references to the Articles of Confederaton, and Supreme Court case excerpts. So thank you for at least watching video. But I don’t think that you were interested in hearing about possible constitutional problems with the land in question the first place.
Your correct. There are a few on this site who are big government hacks and I have had run ins with those in the past. These two are the prime example. Most likely, they make big money off from it..kinda like their hero, Harry Reid.
And there are just as many, if not more, that disagree with him. At the end of the day it's his opinion and his alone. That and a couple of bucks will get him a latte at any Starbucks.
But I don’t think that you were interested in hearing about possible constitutional problems with the land in question the first place.
In all of this, not once have I heard either of you reference Article IV, Section 3. Neither of you have bothered to read any of the enabling acts. And I'm still waiting for an explanation on how, if the government cannot own land outside of D.C. then how it was possible for it to create territories and states on land you say it could not own?