Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oldvirginian

Not only a world war, but a civil war as well.

Perhaps essentially a civil war, with multi-nation support on both sides.


26 posted on 06/07/2015 10:18:57 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: C210N

OK, I’ll go with the civil war with multi-nation support.

But anyway way you look at it, Britain did pretty darn good, being a small island nation.

Not only did they have colonies or possessions in every part of the world, they were so good at seeding their culture everywhere they went.

A post office in Calcutta looked just like one in London.
The same with police stations, hospitals or ministry offices.

It’s easy to see that the Age of Britain paved the way to the Age of America.

Just wish we had had the same “stick it out” mentality the Brit’s had back then.

Imagine the Korean peninsula united under representative govt.
The same with Vietnam.

If we had convincingly won those two, who in the world would screw with us?


30 posted on 06/07/2015 10:53:44 AM PDT by oldvirginian (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

The original idea of supporting America against Great Britain was hatched by Louis XV’s Minister of War. Louis liked the idea as a way of weakening Britain but died before doing anything about it. Louis XVI eventually succumbed to the arguments of Franklin, Lafayette and others but Lafayette supported the American cause with his own money and men before the French King did.


46 posted on 06/07/2015 7:55:20 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson