Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ExNewsExSpook

Sad, isn’t it? That America, the world leader in the automotive industry at the time, could only produce a tank that for the few pluses it did have overall was not a very good armored vehicle in the final analysis.


44 posted on 06/07/2015 2:55:38 PM PDT by jmacusa (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: jmacusa

In 1940, the year German Panzers rolled across the low countries and France, the entire tank development budget for the U.S. Army was only $90,000. Given that level of parsimony, it’s amazing we were able to develop the Sherman. Don’t forget, our “first” medium tank of the war, the Grant, had a side-mounted main gun, because we didn’t have the capability to mount a larger gun in a revolving turret.


47 posted on 06/07/2015 3:46:46 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson