To: don-o
If he was shot with a rifle he most likely won’t have a bullet in him. Good chance he won’t have a bullet in him if he was shot with a handgun of any significance.
The wound channels would be different, but it would seem not really provable as to exactly what caliber.
8 posted on
06/05/2015 6:33:20 AM PDT by
OKSooner
(Chamberlain at least loved his country, please don't insult his memory by comparing him to 0.)
To: OKSooner
Those are good points. I do not mind admitting when I post w/o expertise and am glad to be corrected / enlightened with factual information.
12 posted on
06/05/2015 6:45:17 AM PDT by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: OKSooner
The wounds from high-velocity rifle rounds will be obvious to the medical examiners. If the bikers were shooting firearms at all (still unknown) it would have been with a pistol at close range, also obvious. Anybody down range with high-velocity wound damage will be a victim of a police bullet.
Only 4 or 5 victims died in the kill zone. The rest probably died on the patio, from police bullets that missed their mark in the kill zone.
13 posted on
06/05/2015 6:47:43 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: OKSooner
Wouldn't that depend on the rifle caliber..same with pistols?
And maybe where they shot them? Head, chest..etc..??
95 posted on
06/05/2015 7:00:48 PM PDT by
Osage Orange
(I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson