[DoodleDawg]

In Disney's case, the qualified American workers were already on the job.

Disney did not fire it's U.S. IT workers and replace them with H-1Bs. They outsourced their IT functions to an outside vendor and fired their IT workers. It was the outside vendor who hired the H-1Bs.

[Political Junkie Too]

Disney did not fire it's U.S. IT workers and replace them with H-1Bs. They outsourced their IT functions to an outside vendor and fired their IT workers. It was the outside vendor who hired the H-1Bs.

From the article:

---

HCL America, a branch of a global company based in Noida, India, won a contract with Disney in 2012. In a statement, the company said details of the agreement were confidential. “As a company, we work very closely with the U.S. Department of Labor and strictly adhere to all visa guidelines and requirements to be complied with,” it said.

---

You think Disney didn't know exactly what was going to happen when they chose an Indian company? Do you think Disney can hide behind this arm's-length transaction to avoid accountability for worker-laundering? What would it be called if Disney funnelled cash through a foreign company instead?

-PJ

[DesertRhino]

“Disney did not fire it’s U.S. IT workers and replace them with H-1Bs. They outsourced their IT functions to an outside vendor and fired their IT workers.”

I didn’t have a hamburger. I had a fried ground beef sandwich on a Kaiser roll.