Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WikiLeaks offers $100,000 for details of Obama’s trade deal
Washington Post ^ | 06/03/15

Posted on 06/03/2015 6:09:54 AM PDT by Enlightened1

WikiLeaks put a hit out on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal Tuesday, offering $100,000 to anyone who turns over the chapters that have yet to be leaked.

The government-document exposing organization already published some chapters of the secret deal, but it wants the whole thing. It’s also using crowdfunding to raise the money to pay the bounty. As of around noon Tuesday, 60 people had pledged $23674.17 to reward those who leak “America’s most wanted secret.”

“The transparency clock has run out on the TPP. No more secrecy. No more excuses. Let’s open the TPP once and for all,” WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said in a statement.

Opponents of the global deal argue that the White House shouldn’t be negotiating the terms behind closed doors with the other 11 Pacific Rim nations. Those critics, like Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) say they have a right to ensure the trade agreement has adequate protections for workers and the environment.

Proponents argue its a debate so fragile that airing the specifics publicly would thwart progress. They say the chapters already published by WikiLeaks, ones on the environment and intellectual property, strained talks by inflaming interest groups.

There are 26 “missing chapters” with focus on areas like telecom, labor and agricultural goods that WikiLeaks wants to get its hands on. It posted a video on YouTube showing people talking about the deal as a boon for big international corporations:

(Excerpt) Read more at wapo.st ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: hides; obama; tpp; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Here is the video from Wikileaks about hiding the TPP from the American public. I don't know how any reason person can defend hiding something from the public.

100 to 1 the Founding Fathers would consider High Treason

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNsHAHQh4Es

1 posted on 06/03/2015 6:09:54 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Here’s the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNsHAHQh4Es


2 posted on 06/03/2015 6:10:22 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

You have to pay to see what’s in it!


3 posted on 06/03/2015 6:15:58 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

WHAT you can EXPECT from the administration who promised to be the MOST transparent, and involve everyone in the process, all they need to do is visit the webpage of the White House...they post EVERYTHING, like college records, passport information. Real test and proof to everyone that they have NOTHING TO HIDE, whatsoever, and then after they are gone, you can deal with HILLARY. She LOVES to be transparent.


4 posted on 06/03/2015 6:15:59 AM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

a debate so fragile that airing the specifics publicly would thwart progress.

Translation: If you knew what was in it, we couldn’t
sell it to you. Rather like our current president.


5 posted on 06/03/2015 6:20:00 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
He needs to stick another 0 on that number and he might get some results.

$100,000 buys a nice blingy car these days and not much more, maybe some partying and stuff for a short while... nothing worth risking one's life over.

6 posted on 06/03/2015 6:20:57 AM PDT by OKSooner (Chamberlain at least loved his country, please don't insult his memory by comparing him to 0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

“most transparent administration EVER”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGNgDStJfzs


7 posted on 06/03/2015 6:21:14 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

B.O. , before obama there were line items that were not public.

The CIA budget was never public, and buried deep in other bills.

Also the fun bits, where the first letter in each word would spell a ‘name’, or something of interest.

When did this secret shiite stuff come around?


8 posted on 06/03/2015 6:28:05 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (BINGO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

You’d think Democrats, if they were true to liberal mantras, would treat something like this as utter anathema. This is supposedly a characteristic Republican sin.

Ah, it’s one big pit of shared corruption now.


9 posted on 06/03/2015 6:33:39 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

There used to be The Millionaire show on TV back when a million $ was real money. Now they have some kind of briefcase show about $100,000. What difference, at this point, does $100,000 make?


10 posted on 06/03/2015 6:37:26 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

that could buy 3-4 harleys


11 posted on 06/03/2015 6:38:55 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Another question thst needs to be set before Obama, and then Hillary. Such a simple question.

If the government belongs to the People of the United States, why have we no right to see trade agreements before they happen?


12 posted on 06/03/2015 6:57:28 AM PDT by Yaelle ("You're gonna fly away, Glad you're going my way... I love it when we're Cruzin together")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

A good down payment on your Tesla too...


13 posted on 06/03/2015 6:58:25 AM PDT by Yaelle ("You're gonna fly away, Glad you're going my way... I love it when we're Cruzin together")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Hmmm...I thought wiki already had the TPP...from a thread a couple days ago


14 posted on 06/03/2015 7:09:05 AM PDT by goodnesswins (hey..Wussie Americans....ISIS is coming. Are you ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
If the government belongs to the People of the United States, why have we no right to see trade agreements before they happen?

Because the first part of your sentence is logically invalid.

Also, we do not get to see the trade agreement AFTER it happens, too.

It is a Soviet Style 'Secret Law'.

15 posted on 06/03/2015 7:11:46 AM PDT by Lazamataz (America has less than a year left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

You know, I’m fine with the freedom of the press to publish “leaked” government documents, but when they start offering bounties to entice “leakers” to give them specific documents, it is getting a bit too close to espionage for me.


16 posted on 06/03/2015 4:13:25 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Yeah, classified stuff for “national security” purposes has been around for a long time, but this habit of secrecy in legislation, treaties, and stuff like that seems to have started with Obama, or at least kicked in to high gear at that point. I can’t remember anything major like that before the secret Obamacare negotiations, and secret meetings with executives planning the bailouts.


17 posted on 06/03/2015 4:22:11 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
You’d think Democrats, if they were true to liberal mantras, would treat something like this as utter anathema.

Top Democratic Senator (Barbara Boxer) Blasts Obama's TPP Secrecy

18 posted on 06/03/2015 4:27:28 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
You know, I’m fine with the freedom of the press to publish “leaked” government documents, but when they start offering bounties to entice “leakers” to give them specific documents, it is getting a bit too close to espionage for me.

This isn't a government document.

It is legislation.

Big difference.

19 posted on 06/03/2015 4:28:31 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Hmmm...I thought wiki already had the TPP...from a thread a couple days ago

They have a little of it. They want the whole thing.

20 posted on 06/03/2015 4:30:26 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson