Posted on 06/01/2015 6:23:57 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
SINGAPORESurging military spending across Asia has made it the worlds second-biggest region for such spending over the past decade, but U.S. companies, the biggest sellers of military equipment, are struggling to take full advantage of that growth, even as revenues back home stagnate.
Demand in Asia for defense equipmentand calls for greater U.S. military involvementhave grown as Chinas display of military might in the South China Sea intensifies regional tensions.
Total global spending on defense in 2014 was $1.719 trillion, of which Asia and Oceania contributed $423 billion, or 25%, behind only North Americas $596 billion, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. The figures are calculated using a 2011 base dollar value.
The total for Asia was over $30 billion more than Europe, which it leapfrogged for the No. 2 spot compared with the previous 10-year period, and up 62% over the past decade. Chinaa closed market for U.S. defense companies because of a long-standing arms embargoaccounted for $208 billion of the Asia and Oceania total, spurring its neighbors to boost their spending. Asia and Oceania bought 48% of the weaponry that U.S. companies exported during that period, up from 39% in 2009.
But capitalizing on that boom has proved difficult for U.S. defense companies, which are struggling to dominate Asias important emerging markets as they once did. Many of their weapons systems are too expensive and unnecessarily sophisticated for those customers. There is also more competition from upstarts and established European competitors better able to meet Asias defense needs.
Advertisement
Some of the Asian manufacturers are big exporters, such as Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co. of South Korea. But many others are small compared with U.S. giants such as Boeing Co.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
But Wait.
I thought opening our markets to them would result in “billions of new customers” for us.
How could this be?
The free market
From the piece
“Many of their weapons systems are too expensive and unnecessarily sophisticated for those customers. There is also more competition from upstarts and established European competitors better able to meet Asias defense needs.”
Adapt or die. Our defense industry can no longer rely on the welfare of Congress and the American people as we no longer will write it a blank check
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.