They have done that in many places. I imagine you never heard to ‘Civil Unions’. That wasn’t good enough anywhere it was tried and the gay lobby continued to push for ‘full marriage equality’ even in the face of such laws.
Better that the state simply has no part in marriage whatsoever so the heavy hand of the state not be used against those who only want traditional(real) marriage.
I realize what i sad was impractical. But I want the Supreme Court to address
this issue, that is, homosexuals marriages that are unable to bear children are
equal to male and female marriages that do. I want to see their reasoning. I cant see how governments will not be involved. I want sanity to prevail. I don’t care if gays enter into a union but what I don’t want is the heavy hand of government punishing those that do not agree with gay marriages. We will see.
I realize what i sad was impractical. But I want the Supreme Court to address
this issue, that is, homosexuals marriages that are unable to bear children are
equal to male and female marriages that do. I want to see their reasoning. I cant see how governments will not be involved. I want sanity to prevail. I don’t care if gays enter into a union but what I don’t want is the heavy hand of government punishing those that do not agree with gay marriages. We will see.