To: shove_it
It is really the only practical alternative in today's toxic environment. If the state can't issue a marriage license, it makes it more difficult for the homo lobby to seek out and destroy a Christian business for refusing to celebrate it.
Of course, the state will give up a little revenue from the licensing fee.
2 posted on
05/29/2015 6:51:54 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Vigilanteman
Worth watching. I'm bookmarking this.
Back when in 1870 or so when all my Catholic ancestors came to the USA from Rheinpfalz, Germany, the Catholic Church was opposed to the state institution of civil marriage. It was Bismarck who had pushed it through: licensing gave the German State the power to control something it clearly had no right to control, the institution of marriage.
16 posted on
05/29/2015 8:09:47 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
("You can observe a lot just by watching." - Yogi Berra)
To: Vigilanteman
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3294695/posts?page=2#2
The particular state isn’t the only one giving up revenue; the feds tax married hetero couples more.
That’s why a lot of hetero couples got married in church & didn’t file paperwork with the county clerk.
I agree, get the state & feds out of it & let em lose the $.
24 posted on
05/29/2015 9:00:00 AM PDT by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
To: Vigilanteman
Of course, the state will give up a little revenue from the licensing fee.
Seems like they would make it up by not having the marriage deduction.
60 posted on
05/29/2015 11:44:21 AM PDT by
Know et al
(Keep on Freepin'!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson