Getting a little off track here, but I don’t understand why a transvaginal ultrasound was suggested over a pelvic one to begin with. The baby is still seen regardless. And on one of the articles it mentions a “10-inch rod” being used for a transvaginal ultrasound, whereas on the following link it states the transducer used is slightly smaller than a tampon.
And why would a pregnant woman be so upset over [the discomfort of] one of these ultrasounds anyway, when she plans on having [through abortion] destructive killing instruments placed in the same area to rip her child apart, killing it right on the spot?
http://www.healthcommunities.com/gynecological-tests/pelvic-transvaginal-ultrasound.shtml
That being said, it looks like we are going to have a plethora of candidates who are socially very conservative (thank God), but how is anyone going to know who to vote for? Santorum, Huckabee, Walker, they are very similar in regard to Life, and if Jindal should join in (which I’m still praying he does), we’ll have four such strong pro-Life men.
~~Potentially complicating his 2016 bid, the Wisconsin governor has said he will sign a 20 week abortion bill that currently includes no exemption for rape or incest.~~
Is Walker pro-life? He has been backed by the Koch’s who are pro-abortion.