Its a gross overgeneralization to say that because a case in New York was wrongly decided, that means that the entire judiciary is corrupt.
It is just plain wrong to be casting illogical aspersions on the hundreds, if not thousands of conservative justices in this country who do their job ethically and correctly every single day.
It is also wrong to lump all members of any profession together as if they all think the same way. That’s just silly. There are good justices, there are bad justices. Whenever anyone goes to court, they should know that they will win sometimes and they will lose sometimes. If they lose when they should have won, appeal to a higher court.
Tis but the most recent example. Other examples abound. The gay wedding stuff for example.
It is also wrong to lump all members of any profession together as if they all think the same way. That’s just silly. There are good justices, there are bad justices. Whenever anyone goes to court, they should know that they will win sometimes and they will lose sometimes. If they lose when they should have won, appeal to a higher court.
The courts are somewhat unique in that their work product is not subject to review by objective standards. Everyone else can be objectively analyzed for success or failure, but due to the nature of the Legal system, there is no means of holding them accountable for turning out a horrible work product.
What other profession exists where the quality of your work can be crap but you can still make a living?