Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank
The mountain also provided a clear reason to distrust radioisotope dating.

And they (warmists) assert that they can accurately measure C02 within an ice core sample.

Uh-huh.../s

At least this article admits its errors in a good ol fashioned 'scientific' way (open debate, transparency, w/o ridicule) in THEIR field...

6 posted on 05/26/2015 12:31:23 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869

1. Potassium isotopes are not accurate in rock less than 100,000 years old due to the relatively long half life.

2. Sampling protocol includes measurement of background argon levels.

3. Steve Austen is notorious for misstating sampling protocol and has tried C14 dating on coal millions of years old while knowing that the limit on C14 dating is 50,000 years at the outside.

4. Layering of volcanic ash is a special case and in no way similar to limestones, mudstones, sandstones, salt(which has the tendency to rise above the layer of its initial deposition), granite, metamorphic rock in total, etc.


17 posted on 05/26/2015 1:21:53 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson