Isn’t it hilarious that the US has anti-bribery laws, which work to the disadvantage of American companies competing in overseas arenas where bribery is the norm? While, at the same time, contributions to a US domiciled “foundation” run by the Secretary of State and her ex-President husband accept “donations”—and it’s all legal?
Are we sure these "speeches" are legit?
A Freeper posted that some execs at companies the Foundation listed as giving gargantuan Clinton Honorariums say they never heard of a Cinton giving a speech. And none of the pricey speeches are found on web sites (as is the usual practice).
The just-revealed honorarium payouts include pricey speeches Bill Clinton gave to:
<><> an Irish scholarship fund,
<><> a Korean conglomerate, and,
<><> a Nigerian newspaper company...
..........each of these entities paid Clinton more than half a million dollars........
The Washington Post reported that Hillary Clinton earned $11.7 million by delivering 51 speeches since January, 2014.....she was paid an astonishing $625,000 for two speeches — in one day!
=========================================
AND THIS---Several state and federal agencies the Clintons listed as donors told news outlets they did not contribute to the Clinton Foundation.
<><> EPA is listed as a donor but said there's no record of donations to the Clinton Foundation.
<><> The “Office of Minority Health and Human Services,” is listed but it's not clear what this donation referred to, or even which federal or state office it came from.
<><> The Arkansas Dept of Human Services received a donor "gift receipt" but said they never expended tax dollars to the Foundation.
Scary