We're now in Phase II. We took the senate back from the democrats, now we have to take it back from the republicans. And Portman is a weak link!
Portman (OH) - 2016 - 65% (Average) - 58% (CReview) - 55% (Heritage) - 77% (CFG) - 68% (ACU) - 67% (FreedomWorks)
There's no monster money laundering and election fixing machine on the Left, no sir. But look what those conservatives are up to!
Didn’t say it outright, but implied, the ‘shenanigans’ going on with this lawyer and obscure law firm.
But I’d surprised if anything is ILLEGAL. At best, the hack at politico wants (1) a quick hit piece, and (2) hoping to set IRS hound dogs at their tail.
Unlike all the shenanigans going on at the ‘charitable’ Clinton Foundation.
It seems that whenever an Incumbent Republican gets competition in the party Primary from a self proclaimed Conservative, the end result is the election of a Democrat. It is time we quit shooting ourselves in the foot. Portman may not be perfect, but he is a lot better than Strickland the Democrat.
A conservative announces against Portman last week and lo and behold, this story appears.
________
She must be the one you refer to in your post.
Melissa Strzala
http://www.strzalaforsenate.com/
Ohio ping
If you support Portman or not, this 2 page article about David Langdon describes the money involved in elections. A blackboard would be helpful to make the dots connect.
Remember, Portman poured $100,000 of donations to HIS campaign into Mississippi last June to help Cochran race-bait and defeat McDaniel.
I am inundated with phone calls and mail to donate to Portman. In the past I donated, worked phone banks and canvassed for him. He lost me forever last June. He is clearly ESTABLISHMENT status-quo and must be replaced.