Posted on 05/24/2015 9:27:01 PM PDT by upchuck
The Justice Departments latest filings in the immigration lawsuit brought by 26 states in the Southern District of Texas are a little hard to believeand somewhat comical, in a way.
Back in February, Judge Andrew Hanen issued a preliminary injunction against the implementation of President Obamas executive orders on immigration. Now, in an attempt to explain why the injunction was violated, Leon Rodriguez, director of the U.S. Customs and Immigration Services, has outlined in an affidavit a long list of instructions and orders he gave to implement Hanens order.
The main excuse given for USCISs issuing three-year deferrals and Employment Authorization Documents to 2,000 illegal immigrants after the injunction was in place is that its computer system failed. But fear not. Rodriguez is taking steps, including the modification of USCIS computer systems, to further minimize the potential for human error that could lead to unintended violations of the injunction in future DACA cases, regardless of the circumstances. (There is no indication whether the autonomous computer system that made these errors is named HAL.)
Rodriguez does admit that USCIS should have exercised greater management oversight of the efforts to halt the production and issuance of three-year notices and EADs. But thats not really much of an admissionthere is no question thaat USCIS violated Judge Hanens injunction despite Rodriguezs self-proclaimed clear intent to stop the approval or issuance of these documents. Rodriguez assures the judge that USCIS will get to the bottom of this, his own failure, noting that DHS has asked its inspector general to investigate the circumstances of what happened.
The Justice Department filed a second affidavit, from Donald W. Neufeld, associate director for service center operations at USCIS, supporting Rodriguez. Keep in mind that the administrations main justification for the presidents 2012 program for immigrants who arrived as children (DACA) and for his expanded 2014 program (DAPA) is that, by exercising prosecutorial discretion to legalize illegal immigrants under these programs, DHS could focus on removing the most dangerous aliensthose who are a threat to national security or public safety.
Yet Neufeld blames DHSs unlawful issuance on recently discovered errors in its identification and tracking of cases decided under the 2012 DACA program. In other words, DHS violated Judge Hanens injunction because of tracking errors in its computer system the same system that supposedly will enable DHS to identify the most dangerous illegal immigrants and distinguish them from all of the others receiving benefits under the DACA and DAPA programs.
In fact, while it has admitted to erroneously issuing prohibited deferrals and EADs to 2,000 illegal immigrants, USCIS isnt even sure that is the final number. According to Neufelds affidavit, his efforts to identify all cases in which individuals were wrongly issued these documents remain ongoing. So the total number of cases may change from the estimates previously provided to the Court.
When this computer error admission is combined with the May 4 inspector general report that DHS does not gather and analyze prosecutorial discretion data on DACA participants, it makes it difficult for the Justice Department to credibly argue that the DACA and DAPA programs will enable the administration to concentrate its efforts on deporting the most dangerous illegal immigrants. As Texas and the states say in a brief filed on May 20, these explanations by the government further confirm the unwieldiness of the DAPA/DACA bureaucracyso large and complex that not even Defendants have a full grasp of what their machinery is doing.
It’s funny how these computer issues never seem to happen in the inverse “sorry Pedro, we can’t issue your 3 year deferral because of a computer error”.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96
18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS
Will someone eventually apply the appropriate penalties to these corrupt traitors?
Yep, those NSA files are what's going to keep the incumbents the incumbents until there is a real revolution. They make "1984" look like an infantile prattle.
The judge should make a list of the administration’s lawyers, and send one per week to Sheriff Joe’s jail in AZ until they comply.
Create a NEW work permit for non-Citizen Vistors.
Declare all previous paperwork for DARPA, DACA, etc null and void, to be shredded by anyone and everyone.
Start over.
No. It was deliberate.
“Keep in mind that the administrations main justification for the presidents 2012 program for immigrants who arrived as children (DACA) and for his expanded 2014 program (DAPA) is that, by exercising prosecutorial discretion to legalize illegal immigrants under these programs, DHS could focus on removing the most dangerous aliensthose who are a threat to national security or public safety”
So have they been concentrating on recapturing and deporting all the alien criminals that they released from jail last year?? If they have, I haven’t read about it and I sincerely doubt it’s happening.
“Did Obama Administration Really Accidentally Disobey Judges Order on Immigration?”
Do bears use flush toilets in the woods?
It was not an accident. They willfully disobeyed the Judge’s Order on immigration.
He has an army of lawyers.....this could not have been an accident.
There is no accident, only ARROGANCE.
Throw ‘em in jail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.