>>>> ...... it’s possible that he might still have reached a similar conclusion.
If that IS the case, why would he fudge data? The logical conclusion is that because the data either does not support “the foregone conclusion”, or at best falls in ‘statistically marginal’ conclusion either way.
But TNR and the progressives are bound and determined to continue to ‘study until they’re proven right’.
Fudge data? Eeeewwwwww.....