So a hundred candidates at 1 minute a piece would give us what insight?
In this day of mass-media/internet, does anyone REALLY believe a televised sound-bite factory will suffice?
Is there not enough electrons for YouTube/etc. to host a multitude of debates, from each candidate, where the war of ideas reign supreme?
Unfortunately, I think (even by most here) the standard reply of “Me too, but here’s how *I’d* do it (miniscule) different” play out better.
SOMEHOW, competition is great...unless it’s for the highest office in the land; then, and ONLY then, should it be a popularity contest of make-up/looks and blurbs
And we rag on the Left for ‘low-info voters’...