Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck

Perhaps it should have been qualified as to the scope of food selection provided to the so-called “needy”. There clearly needs to be a prohibition on hi-dollar food items on the taxpayer dime. Such as no alcohol!!


37 posted on 05/20/2015 5:06:47 PM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: SgtHooper

I have yet to meet anyone using Link food benefits that was allowed to buy alcoholic beverages with it. Sounds like a strawman to me.


43 posted on 05/20/2015 5:09:07 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: SgtHooper

Alcohol is already prohibited.


45 posted on 05/20/2015 5:09:59 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: SgtHooper

There are quite a few food stamp use prohibitions existing, i.e., alcohol, tobacco products, ‘to go’ foods (Mackie D’s), etc. Lobster, yes, bot if they buy 1 lb lobster @ $13/lb, that’s 4 lbs of ground beef @ $3/lb they won’t get, which of course would go farther.

On the other hand, I’ve heard some recipients trade their food benefit for cash to buy alcohol/cigarettes/Mackie D’s). There will always be those who work their way around the system, unfortunately, so all the good intentions can be for naught.


78 posted on 05/20/2015 5:52:19 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson