[DiogenesLamp]

No actually. Consider the flip side, if another judge performed a normal marriage, should they recuse themselves because of bias on the normal side?

Biased towards normalcy? There is *SUPPOSED* to be bias towards normalcy. It's called "sanity."

No, the converse argument does not work. Your theory hinges on the foundation that sickness and weirdity are socially and morally equivalent to normalcy.

[fruser1]

“No, the converse argument does not work.”

It does. However perverse, the procedure is legal where she performed it. As such, it’s not grounds for recusal. For that, you need advocacy.