To: 2ndDivisionVet
RE:”
Scott Walker is a terrific governor and an attractive candidate, but he has no foreign policy experienceunlike Reagan, who did a weekly foreign policy radio broadcast for a decade, and did his own research. Walker could persuade me that he knows what hes doing, but I havent heard much from him yet. Foreign policy is too important for the next administration for us to elect a president who needs on-the-job training” ???
Lets not be ridiculous.
I wasn't going to comment until I saw this ludicrous ending.
That is an argument for Cruz as POTUS??
9 posted on
05/16/2015 10:36:22 PM PDT by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: sickoflibs
That’s the author’s opinion. Maybe start a news site or a blog and share your opinions.
12 posted on
05/16/2015 10:41:00 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
To: sickoflibs
Be honest. Walker has been all over the map with immigration and other larger than the state issues.
22 posted on
05/16/2015 10:57:22 PM PDT by
DB
To: sickoflibs
Yep—though more of an argument warning of the potential for Walker to melt down in a campaign against Hillary.
My position of Cruz over Walker is that Cruz is at least less bad on illegal immigration.
To: sickoflibs
I wouldn’t say it’s a argument for Ted Cruz, it’s just the author’s reasoning to not put to much faith in Scott Walker’s foreign policy experiamce, or so they say, the lack of it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson