Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
Reconstruction would not have turned out as it did had Lincoln survived for the simple reason that the Radicals would have been unable to outmaneuver Lincoln.

Nobody EVER outmaneuvered Lincoln, probably the most effective pure politician in US history. Johnson, OTOH, was perhaps the worst. He alienated even people who really, really wanted to support him.

I agree with you. Lincoln was exceedingly shrewd. This is why I find it credible that he correctly manipulated the Confederates into starting the war. All they had to do was sit on their hands, and the Secession would have become a fait accompli. The only thing which could have changed the dynamic was if they gave the Union an excuse to wage war.

Que Abraham Lincoln and his brilliant ploy to get them to attack. I don't know if he played them like a fiddle, but it is not an unreasonable conjecture from what I've seen. One of my oldest Friends who is Black, and a History Major, thoroughly believes that Lincoln engineered the start of the Civil war by his ability to read and predict people.

Yes, Lincoln was quite the clever fellow.

26 posted on 05/16/2015 7:49:01 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Lincoln's single greatest asset for the first year or so was his image as the original gorilla ignorant hick.

Everybody misunderestimated him. Seward even sent him a memo intimating Lincoln should delegate power to run the government to him, because Lincoln couldn't handle it.

Of course, after a year or so everybody looked around, noticed what he'd accomplished in that year and said, "Wait, what?"

What is even more interesting is that even his greatest rivals, like Seward, generally became loyal supporters as they got to know him.

28 posted on 05/16/2015 7:59:08 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
“Que Abraham Lincoln and his brilliant ploy to get them to attack.”

The war started with the Gulf of Tonkin incident . . . er, I mean the Fort Sumter incident.

36 posted on 05/16/2015 8:23:26 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

i dunno but if he was really really smart he would have worked to avoid a civil war and deconstruct slavery in a way that would not have caused the problems we have today. a lot of Black and white slaves to government. i’m not a civil war history expert but this is just my opinion from where i see things today. Fed government control based on the 14th amendment which wasn’t needed. Once there was no slavery everyone born in the US had the same status under the existing constitution. enforcement of the constitution which didn’t happen is the same problem we have today. make another law, make another amendment, don’t enforce the one we have.


41 posted on 05/16/2015 9:20:41 AM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
This is why I find it credible that he correctly manipulated the Confederates into starting the war. All they had to do was sit on their hands, and the Secession would have become a fait accompli. The only thing which could have changed the dynamic was if they gave the Union an excuse to wage war.

Silly. It was a volatile situation. A lot of different things could have happened. Maybe Southerners would have realized how foolish the whole thing was and given it up. That was certainly what unionists hoped for and expected.

I would suggest that the secessionist leadership wanted a major break, a point of no return. They also wanted something dramatic to tip Virginia and the Upper South, which had rejected secession, into the secessionist camp. If the event was dramatic enough, it might bring the Border States into the Confederacy.

Also, Davis and his government were like the French Revolutionary leader who went running after the crowd saying "I must follow them for I am their leader." They had to get out in front of the hotheads in South Carolina and elsewhere and show that they were really running the show. They had to demonstrate their leadership and earn public support somehow.

So no, they weren't going to sit on their hands, and they weren't necessarily "manipulated" into anything either.

48 posted on 05/16/2015 12:07:09 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
This is why I find it credible that he correctly manipulated the Confederates into starting the war. All they had to do was sit on their hands, and the Secession would have become a fait accompli. The only thing which could have changed the dynamic was if they gave the Union an excuse to wage war.

The U.S. was responsible because you think the Declaration of Independence OK'd it and Lincoln somehow tricked them into starting the war. I find it very amusing that you don't think the South bears any responsibility for anything that happened to them.

78 posted on 05/17/2015 6:48:41 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson