Really interesting look at the inner workings of jury deliberations. I'm sure the other jurors may disagree, but based on what this guy said, it looks like he really understands the role of a jury in our system. Good to see.
To: Conscience of a Conservative
There was no physical evidence tying this suspect to the crime. There were no eyewitnesses. There was a confession, but it came from a man with psychiatric issues and it revealed no details that only the murderer would have known. And there was another suspect. All of this together to me spells reasonable doubt.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson