Skip to comments.
Anti-Gun Democrat Lawmaker Blasts Girlfriend’s Car With Shotgun
http://bearingarms.com ^
| May 11, 2015
| Bob Owens
Posted on 05/12/2015 5:20:11 AM PDT by Yosemitest
(Excerpt)
One thing we’ve noticed about supporters of gun control is that they tend project their own temper/impulse control/mental health shortcomings onto others.
That is, they know that they don’t have the temperament to avoid using firearms when angry,
and since they can’t control themselves, they assume everyone else has the same deficiencies.
It seems like one of those anti-gun Democrats in Detroit proved his own inability to control his temper early Sunday morning,
as he blasted away with a shotgun to his girlfriend’s car over what should have been a simple domestic argument:
Sources told Local 4 state Sen. Virgil Smith, who represents the fourth district, fired several shots into the woman’s car.
Investigators walked out of Smith’s home with what appeared to be a shotgun wrapped in a garbage bag.
Investigators with Detroit police placed it in the backseat of an unmarked car.
Around 1 a.m. Sunday police were called to Smith’s home for reports of shots fired
Sources told Local 4 that early Sunday morning Smith and his girlfriend, a prominent businesswoman from Ann Arbor, got into an argument.
Police said the victim told them multiple shots were fired in front of the home at Wexford and Hilldale, on the east side.
Being an anti-gun Democrat in a Democrat-controlled city, Senator Virgil Smith has not been arrested for
assault with a deadly weapon,
discharging a weapon within city limits, property damage,
or any of the other charge that the non-politically-connected might have faced for such obvious criminal behavior.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; democrat; guncontrol; virgilsmith
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Here's another link to a source with a video.
To: Yosemitest
Maybe sensible gun control should just be “no democrats allowed to own fire arms”, since it is apparent that they are the group who generally are a danger to the public.
To: kevslisababy
3
posted on
05/12/2015 5:27:23 AM PDT
by
samtheman
To: Yosemitest
4
posted on
05/12/2015 5:28:07 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: Yosemitest
Just repeating:
Anti-Gun Democrat Lawmaker.
To: kevslisababy
Did I mention
one source reported :
" ... His ex-wife says she was met by a naked Smith at the front door of his home in the 18000 block of Wexford on the citys east side
and he beat her with his fists, chased her outside and shot at her four or five times as well as firing at her car. ... "
6
posted on
05/12/2015 5:31:45 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: cripplecreek
I guess my source is “a little behind the power curve” .
7
posted on
05/12/2015 5:32:32 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
Chased her while he was naked and shot at her as he ran? What a mental picture that is. I guess he knew the difference in his rifle and his gun.
8
posted on
05/12/2015 5:44:47 AM PDT
by
Sasparilla
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: Sasparilla
When will the DemocRATS' "WAR ON WOMEN" STOP !
9
posted on
05/12/2015 5:51:15 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: kevslisababy
I think you're on to something. Anyone who is pro "gun control" ought to be immediately banned from possessing firearms. Far too many advocates of "gun control" state that firearms lead to crimes etc. - in effect blaming the firearm as if it were not a simple inanimate object.
I believe these types of people are projecting their own fears and fantasies onto the weapon. They fear firearms and their fellow citizens being armed because they know in their hearts they themselves cannot be trusted with firearms. Therefore they think no-one is capable of the discipline and self control to own firearms without endangering their fellow man.
In other words, anyone who says we can't be trusted with firearms is in-effect stating they cannot be trusted with firearms. All pro "gun control" people should be disarmed.
10
posted on
05/12/2015 6:15:10 AM PDT
by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: samtheman
In re anti-gun hopolophobes; just look up the meaning of the term “projection” and you will get the point.
11
posted on
05/12/2015 6:22:38 AM PDT
by
Flintlock
(Our soapbox is gone, the ballot box stolen--we're left with the bullet box now.)
To: Flintlock
"... just look up the meaning of the term projectionand you will get the point. ..."
Here's something to consider about liberals, and conservatives.
The liberal's problem is psychological projection.
Liberals do this all the time.
Here's a definition.Freudian ProjectionThe following is a collection of definitions of projection from orthodox psychology texts.
In this system the distinct mechanism of projecting own unconscious or undesirable characteristics onto an opponent is called Freudian Projection.
- "A defense mechanism in which the individual attributes to other people impulses and traits that he himself has but cannot accept.
It is especially likely to occur when the person lacks insight into his own impulses and traits."
- "The externalisation of internal unconscious wishes, desires or emotions on to other people.
So, for example, someone who feels subconsciously that they have a powerful latent homosexual drive may not acknowledge this consciously, but it may show in their readiness to suspect others of being homosexual."
![](http://www.freudfile.org/fliess.jpg)
- "Attributing one's own undesirable traits to other people or agencies, e.g., an aggressive man accuses other people of being hostile."
- "The individual perceives in others the motive he denies having himself.
Thus the cheat is sure that everyone else is dishonest.
The would-be adulterer accuses his wife of infidelity."
- "People attribute their own undesirable traits onto others.
An individual who unconsciously recognises his or her aggressive tendencies may then see other people acting in an excessively aggressive way."
- "Projection is the opposite defence mechanism to identification.
We project our own unpleasant feelings onto someone else and blame them for having thoughts that we really have."
And here's a problem with honest people.
(General) ProjectionHere projection is assuming that others act or perceive similarly according to this definition it is not necessary for a projected trait to be undesirable or unconscious.
Projection is probably inherent in social animals and the single most important psychological mechanism.
The following are given as examples:
- Individual A assumes that B sees the colour red as he does, until informed that B is colour-blind;
- Someone who never lies is easy to deceive because he projects his truthfulness onto others, assuming that others are honest also;
- It takes one to know one;
- An inept con-man fears that others are trying to cheat him, signals his fear and alerts others;
- (Freudian) An individual who possesses malicious characteristics, but who is unwilling to perceive himself as a protagonist, convinces himself that his opponent feels and would act the same way.
Liberals constantly project their own vile values onto conservatives, intentionally or unintentionally,
and they need to called on it, shamed on it, and laughed at to scorn, when they do it.
We MUST get rid of these evil people.
12
posted on
05/12/2015 6:40:34 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
Smith has not been charged. At this point, police won't confirm if he was even questioned or taken into custody. ...sounds like someone has either Democrat Privilege or Black Privilege, being from Detroit.
To: Yosemitest
Most LIBs shouldn't be any where near guns or sharp objects. Historically, they are the ones who are irresponsible with weapons. Of course, that they are insane should be a disqualifier.
14
posted on
05/12/2015 6:44:13 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: hal ogen
Nor should they be able to HIRE people with guns to protect them, since they would be directing the use of those guns.
They should LIVE BY their own words, WAITING FOR police to respond to protect them.
LIBERALS ... they're a CURSE on our CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS
15
posted on
05/12/2015 6:49:32 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: TexasCajun
"... someone has either Democrat Privilege or Black Privilege ... "
It's CRIMINALS protecting CRIMINALS .
16
posted on
05/12/2015 6:52:11 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
It's CRIMINALS protecting CRIMINALS . Well, I did say "Democrat Privilege".
To: TexasCajun
Since DemocRATS have taken over today’s PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEM, you can NO LONGER assume that the general public can “CONNECT THE DOTS” .
18
posted on
05/12/2015 7:00:14 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
I still want to know if he was holding the shotgun sideways.
19
posted on
05/12/2015 9:33:58 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Sasparilla
I heard that he already had another g/f in the house at the time.
20
posted on
05/12/2015 9:35:19 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson