NFL Suspends Tom Brady, Punishes Patriots For "Deflategate" [Slap On The Wrist?]

CBS News ^ | May 11, 2015

[Steelfish]

May 11, 2015 NFL Suspends Tom Brady, Punishes Patriots For "Deflategate"

The NFL announced Monday that it was suspending New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady for his role in a scheme to deflate footballs used in last season's AFC championship game, a controversy that came to be known as "Deflategate."

In a statement released Monday afternoon, the league said the Super Bowl MVP "will be suspended without pay for the first four games of the 2015 regular season for conduct detrimental to the integrity of the NFL."

The league also fined the Patriots $1 million and took away two draft picks, including next years' first-round choice, "for the violation of the playing rules and the failure to cooperate in the subsequent investigation."

In addition, the NFL indefinitely suspended the two Patriots equipment staffers who carried out the plan, including one who called himself "The Deflator."

The punishment was imposed five days after a 243-page report prepared by league-appointed investigator Ted Wells said Brady "was at least generally aware" of plans by the team employees to prepare the balls to his liking, below the league-mandated minimum of 12.5 pounds per square inch.

[right way right]

Seems to me Tom Brady should challenge this.
(Unless he is guilty)

[Kazan]

Brady doesn’t need football, football needs Brady.

With Aaron Rodgers, Andrew Luck and Russell Wilson around for five or more years, the league would be just fine if Brady retired tomorrow.

[wintertime]

This means that Rush Limbaugh will spend the entire 3 hours of his show talking about it tomorrow. BORING!

[Nachum]

Patriots announce Dom Grady will start in place of suspended Tom Brady for the first 4 games of the season.

[Smittie]

He knew what was going on, he wouldn't have had that big smirk on his face during that last interview if he didn't. If someone was casting doubt on my integrity at my livelihood I sure wouldn't be smirking. He didn't follow the rules and thereby is a cheater. Doesn't matter if it was a " minor " violation or not.

Personally, last season was enough for me. I don't care if the NFL ever plays another game...

[campaignPete R-CT]

the world is crazy.

there is this and theres that ...
even the sane people are nuts. we know the women are nutz and the men are like women.

The only thing that works like it supposed to is playoff hockey.

joue a hockey?

[campaignPete R-CT]

Mujica just did a 1-2-3 8th inning against the BoSox.

[Nachum]

Leaked photo of Tom Brady's Super Bowl Ring

[Ransomed]

Or if it is really a big deal to the NFL, just check the current play ball during the million commercial breaks. And officials just keep the pointed spheroids in their control. It’s a multibillion dollar industry, they could figure it out. The real story here is how the NFL winks at everything that gives an edge to offense as long as it doesn’t upset the sensibilities of the average fan.

Freegards

[bluejean]

“The Commissioner doing whatever he likes to stomp on the Patriots.”

Nah. The Patriots are untouchable. Brady is untouchable. Quarterbacks on every other team suffer tackles that are unacceptable for Brady. Flags get thrown if Brady feels air move around his special self. He’s worth too much money. I doubt the Commish wanted to to anything at all about this.

The Commish had to do something because the fan uproar after the Saints’ mess (completely unrelated but another recent scandal) and Spygate would have been ridiculous if the Patriots walked again. Purely a financial decision. Make it look like something was done. Calm the fan beast. It’s all about the money. Always is. Just a theory. What it looks like to me.

[Colofornian]

...the balls they are referring to were used in the first half only of that AFC game....then removed....the Pats didn't start really winning until the supposed "inflated" balls were removed....

Not so. In the 2nd half, the Pats scored once on a short-drive TD set up by an interception; on that drive, Brady threw no passes.

Take away that TD, the Pat offense scored on 3-of-5 drives in the 2nd half; in the first half, the Pat offense scored on 3-of-5 drives (so the same in terms of scoring drives)

Secondly, take away a 30-yard Brady pass to Vereen in the first half (if Vereen wasn't able to hold on to such a softened ball in pelting rain), and the Pats wouldn't have scored that drive.

No score that drive, puts the Pats up 10-7 at half instead of 17-7.

It was only when the Colts were down 17-7 that they essentially abandoned their ground game, which, up until then, was gaining 5 yards a pop.

In a pelting rain, the ground gain is essential.

'Twas the two-score lead that moved the Colts out of the ground game...dangerous to do in such weather.

Would the Colts still have lost? Perhaps. Would the game have been closer minus the softened balls? Probably.

[Colofornian]

I like some of the posts on a Boston website - If you suspend one, then you suspend all. Win as a team, lose as a team.

Yeah, I can see it now: Brady wins his appeal, but the two equipment guys, including the one who calls himself "the deflator," don't even get an appeal.

Let's see how far that Patriot "suspend one--in this case, two -- suspend all" goes.

Wouldn't go anywhere. Those guys would be tossed under the bus...and you know it.

So much for rah-rah, sis-boom-bah in Boston!!!!

[Colofornian]

If the balls were a little under pressure it didn’t make enough difference to worry about.

The article I read tonight indicated the NFL cracked down hard here because evidence existed this had been going on before the Colts' game. (Hey, the Colts even wrote to the NFL about it before their game)

I contend this has been going on since 2007, when Brady's lobbying won teams the right to supply their own footballs.

'Deflategate'

How was it 11 of a dozen Patriot footballs came to be deflated below NFL standards by halftime of the Jan. 18 playoff game with the Colts?

'Ballghazi'

How was it that the Patriots were your average 1.6 to 1.8-fumble-per-game football team 1999-2006 and by 2007 not a single Patriot running back fumbled on a running play...as in NO rushing fumbles all season long...stretching into the post-season for all three playoff games as well? (And then that type of fumble-free patterns stretched not only three extra games, but eight YEARS!)

'Pat-Flattened Pigskins?': Leprechauns on the Loose in New England?

How might a statistical analyst give his “best case” that leprechauns are indeed at large in New England?

Well, what if I told you that the Patriots' DEFENSE fumbled the ball...

...more often in (take your pick which of these following seasons) – 2003, 2002, 2001, 1999 than the Patriots' running backs did rushing the ball in 2007 – even including all three playoff games?

...Or their DEFENSE fumbled the ball as often in 2001 as the Patriots' running backs did rushing the ball for the entire 2007 and 2008 seasons combined (35 games including three playoff games)?!

...Or their DEFENSE fumbled the ball as much combining regular seasons 1999-2003 as did the Patriots running backs' rushing the ball combining regular seasons 2007-2008 and 2010-2011?

(Now you know what the job description of a New England leprechaun is every pre-game!)

Beyond that, just compare the 2006-2007 seasons and broader patterns (either 2000-2014, or 2003-2014)

Charting a Snapshot of 'Ballghazi's' 'Ghost': A

Category	2006 NE Season	2007 NE Season
Overall fumbles	31 (27 regular season)	17 (14 regular season)
Rushing fumbles by Patriot running backs	7 (19 games, including 3 playoffs)	0 (19 games, including 3 playoffs)
Fumble rate per game	Avg team: 1.5 vs. NE's 1.6	Avg team: 1.6 vs. NE's 0.8 (Less fumbles by half!) Note: Even indoor based teams averaged 1.55 fumbles per game)
Brady's Completion %	61.8%	68.9%

Charting a Snapshot of 'Ballghazi's' 'Ghost': B

Fumbles by Teams Per Game
2003-2006 NE	2003-2006 Other 31 teams	2007-2014 NE	2007-2014 Other 23 Outdoor teams	2007-2014 Indoor-based teams (8)
1.46	1.6	0.96 [this is improvement of 1 less fumble every 2 games vs. previous NE teams]	1.46 [this means one more fumble every 2 games than NE]	1.29 [this means one more fumble every 3 games than NE]

Source for most raw fumbles-per-games stats: NFL Team Fumbles per Game: Per Year 2014 → 2003

[Colofornian]

If the balls were a little under pressure it didn’t make enough difference to worry about.

Follow-up to last post:

Comparing Individual Player Statistics when Playing for New England Patriots 2007-->2014 vs Playing for other NFL teams or playing for the Patriots before 2007

Left side: NE PLAYER: 07-14	Right side: NON-NE PLAYER + NE PLAYERS PRE-2007
NAME	RECEPTIONS	RUSHES	TOUCHES	'RELEVANT' FUMBLES*	'RELEVANT' FUMBLES PER TOUCH	RECEPTIONS	RUSHES	TOUCHES	'RELEVANT' FUMBLES	'RELEVANT' FUMBLES PER TOUCH
Wes Welker	741	21	762	6 relevant (other 6 on special teams)	1 per 127	237	1	238	0 relevant (all 13 on special teams)	Less than 1 per 238
Laurence Maroney	45	644	689	5	1 per 138	5	67	72	3	1 per 24
BenJarvus Green-Ellis	31	557	588	0	Less than 1 per 588	28	517	545	5	1 per 109
Kevin Faulk	181	252	433	1 relevant (1 special team)	1 per 433	301	700	1001	20 relevant (4 special teams)	1 per 50
Danny Woodhead	104	285	389	3	1 per 130	160	95	255	2	1 per 128
Sammy Morris	52	335	387	3 relevant (1 special team)	1 per 129	117	402	519	8	1 per 65
LaGarrette Blount	6	275	281	3	1 per 94	27	491	518	All 10 relevant	1 per 52
Randy Moss	271	3	274	All 5 relevant	1 per 55	765	23	788	8 relevant by comparison (3 special teams)	1 per 98
Deion Branch	130	0	63	0	Less than 1 per 63	452	11	463	1 relevant (2 special teams by comparison)	1 per 463
Fred Taylor	4	108	112	1	1 per 112	293	2555	2848	All 26 relevant by comparison	1 per 110
Danny Amendola	90	2	92	0 relevant (1 special team)	Less than 1 per 92	196	12	208	5 relevant by comparison (5 special teams)	1 per 42
Ben Watson	91	1	92	2	1 per 46	210	1	211	6	1 per 35
Brandon Lloyd	86	0	86	0	Less than 1 per 86	325	1	326	4	1 per 82
Brandon Lafell	83	2	85	1	1 per 85	171	7	178	2	1 per 89
Lamont Jordan	0	80	80	1	1 per 80	163	856	1019	7 relevant (1 special team)	1 per 146
Jabar Gaffney	78	0	78	0	Less than 1 per 78	394	9	403	3 relevant (1 special team)	1 per 134
Heath Evans	8	48	56	0	less than 1 per 56	59	121	180	3	1 per 60
Donte Stallworth	55	1	56	0	Less than 1 per 56	280	20	300	3 relevant (2 special teams)	1 per 100
Brandon Tate	24	6	30	1	1 per 30	31	4	35	0 relevant (11 special teams by comparison)	Less than 1 per 35
TOTALS	2080	2620	4700	32	1 in 145	4214	5993	10107	116	1 in 87
8 Players' collective totals who had 274+ touches for Patriots	1431	2372	3803	20	1 per 190	Non-NE or Early NE	1640	2296	56	1 per 70

Note: Relevant' Fumbles Defined: Fumbles committed while rushing the ball or after reception – not special teams' fumbles.

Shenanigan naysaying

Yet despite an NFL-on-the-record fine for a certain Bostonian coach's reputation for shelling out shenanigans ensued by a current NFL-paid attorney investigating the whole football shakedown, many naysayers still doubt these knomes actually exist beyond the legion of urban legends.

So, for certain NFL attorneys who may want to delve into local Boston lore, what pot o' gold nuggets of evidence seems to suggest shenanigans on the loose going back about 8 years?

Note: before assessing chart below, it might be of help to review Warren Sharp's original chart on 19 of these players below:

* Jan. 28, 2015 “update”: New England Patriots Fumble More Often When Playing for Other Teams)
* See also: January 22, 2015: The New England Patriots Prevention of Fumbles is Nearly Impossible and...
* January 23 2015 Slate: Dumb Luck: The New England Patriots’ prevention of fumbles is nearly impossible.

Pat stats: Considerations Weighing Against/For – Sudden Shameful Shamrock Shenanigans in New England

Indicators of 'Deflategate' & 'Ballghazi' as Urban Legend	Red Flags in Pat Stats Suggesting Shenanigans
1. Warren Sharp's analytics case of embellished fumbles (what was he thinking – or not thinking – anyway?) Sharp treated all fumbles as “equal” & “relevant” research. But, alas, they aren't. Simply put, if a team is accused of doctoring their own footballs, & if special teams use a common pool of balls providing no competitive advantage, then special teams' fumbles are irrelevant & need special segmenting from all analytical charts. This impacted Sharp's charts how? One Sharp chart lists 19 players who were either former Patriots or played elsewhere prior to coming to New England. These 19 lost 124 overall fumbles. The problem is three dozen fumbles occurred during returning a punt or kick. (That's 29% of fumbles in list).	1. The “however” to this is it's an “equal-opportunity” application mistake: On the other side of the ledger – those tracking Pat fumbles 2007-2014 – 9 of 39 fumbles were likewise special teams (23% vs. 29% on other side). In other words: Most of fumbles removed from the balance sheet prove to be “a wash.” All it does is to heighten the number of touches on each comparison side per fumble. It is true -- for sake of only including 'relevant' fumbles as it applies to this case study -- that Sharp's "44 touches per fumble" & "73 touches per fumble is a myth. The actual touches are much higher on both comparative sides. Also, when playoff stats are added to Sharp's charts along with one additional measurement – RB Kevin Faulk – it fleshes out an even a greater “measurement”: The lopsided “touches per fumble” ratio Sharp arrived at – 98 – 67 among those 19 players & 107-53 among the five players with 300+ Patriot touches...grows to 145-87 among 20 players & an astounding 190-70 split among 8 players with 274+ touches (Wes Welker, Laurence Maroney, BenJarvus Green-Ellis, Faulk, Danny Woodhead, Sammy Morris, LeGarrette Blount, & Randy Moss)
1a. How did (1) above play out? Wes Welker, for example, returned punts/kickoffs for both Pats & other teams: Therefore, half of his Pat fumbles were irrelevant to case study & ALL of his non-Patriot fumbles were likewise irrelevant. Same with Brandon Tate re: his non-Patriot fumbles (all irrelevant). One would think that including Tate's 11 fumbles in only 35 touches would greatly skew the results to work against Sharp's hypothesis. A dozen other fumbles were likewise removed on the non Pats' side: (Amendola, 5; Moss, 3; Stallworth, 2; + Jordan & Gaffney, 1 apiece).	1a. How the above played out on Pat stat side '07-14: Welker returned punts & kicks for the Pats, too: So half of his fumbles were special teams' related. Amendola & Morris also had each had a special teams' fumbles removed. And tho Sharp didn't include Kevin Faulk in his chart because Faulk only played for the Pats, Faulk is perhaps THE most interesting case study, but not for special teams' sake (Faulk had one special teams' fumble removed from his stat total; beyond that, he only fumbled once in his last five seasons with the Pats - & it was a reception, not a rush. By comparison, in the alleged pre-Ballghazi era, Faulk fumbled it 24 times (4 special teams) over eight seasons: 13 rushing, 7 after catches. IoW, he averaged 1 'relevant' fumble every 35 touches thru 2006; suddenly it mushroomed to 1 'relevant' fumble every 433 touches 2007-2011. IoW, Kevin Faulk himself is the face -- the poster boy -- for 'ballghazi shenanigans'!
2. 'Relevant' fumbles & fumble ratios: When the raw fumbles #s are scrubbed & only 'relevant ones remain, 8 of 19 players Sharp analyzed don't match the “we fumbled more wearing non-Patriot shirts” narrative: Danny Woodhead, Fred Taylor, Brandon Lloyd, Brandon Lafell, Deion Branch & Lamont Jordan all have similar fumble ratio numbers no matter which team they've played for; + Wes Welker, Randy Moss – when properly stripped of those special teams' fumbles – even showed significantly more of a penchant to fumble when playing for the Patriots.	2. Collective stats for 11 Patriots 2007-2014 show only 1 fumble every 472 touches! While some of the Patriot fumble “miserliness” 07-14 are indeed attributable to guys who tend not to fumble often (beyond special teams at least) – Welker, Woodhead, & Laurence Maroney. Yet when the other 15 Rbs & Wide-outs are surveyed, 'twas an “almost impossible” scenario to look @ the stats of 11 of them & realize these 11 combined for almost 1900 touches between them during those 8 seasons, & yet they fumbled only four times: 1889 touches & only four collective fumbles by Green-Ellis, Faulk, Branch, Taylor, Amendola, Lloyd, Lafell, Jordan, Gaffney, Evans, Stallworth – that's only one fumble per 472 touches
3. A fumble-by-fumble review turns up that the players most responsible for Pat fumbles were quarterbacks! “NFL Fumble Pie” is cut up into 5 pieces: Fumbles by Qbs, Rbs, Receivers, Special teams, & the occasional post-interception fumble. For 1999-2006, Pats Qbs made 45% of fumbles; that was reduced to 33% 2007-2014. Sharp (& others including myself) don't want to include Qbs for analysis purposes because they already tend to have an untucked ball in most play situations. The key point here, though, is between 07-14, Pats Qbs + special teams accounted for over half of all team fumbles, leaving less room to “shenanigize” anything	3. The so-called “flip side” of this argument is actually the same argument: Yes, review the fumbles to see who was actually making them, or rather, no longer coming even close to making them. How is it that the Patriot Rbs averaged less than 3 fumbles per season 2007-2014? How is it than when you include playoff games, the Pats average a rushing fumble by a RB or wide-out about once every six games? How did the Pats go through '07 –19 games including playoffs – without its Rbs managing to fumble the ball on a rushing play? (Kevin Faulk had one fumble – but even that came on pass he caught)
4. If you're trying to explain why Brady had his sudden 2007 completion % surge, look no further than Randy Moss. Moss had previously had two 100+ reception years; his new presence in '07 accounted for 98 receptions.	4. Indeed, personnel are very important considerations. And it's personnel breakdown charts like the one below – a corrective revision of Warren Sharp's – listing 19 players that makes the 'Ballghazi' case. (Note: added Kevin Faulk as a 20th player because Faulk had over 430 touches post 2006 & that can be readily compared to his 1999-2006 Patriot seasons where he had 700 touches) – that also provides a “face” to this “ghost” of “Ballghazi.”

Chart Summary: Distinctions between Warren Sharp stats and those below (See Jan. 28, 2015 “update”: New England Patriots Fumble More Often When Playing for Other Teams)

Fumbles-per-touch analytics
STATISTICAL BOUNDARIES	COLOFORNIAN'S ANALYTICAL BOUNDARIES	WARREN SHARP'S ANALYTICAL BOUNDARIES
Are only 'relevant' fumbles -- non-special teams' fumbles -- included in fumbles per touch comparisons?	YES	NO (Sharp's are accumulative)
Are playoff stats included in 'relevant' fumbles by touch comparisons?	YES	NO (Sharp uses only season stats despite very controversy arising in playoff context)
Are pre-2007 Patriots stats included in 'relevant fumbles by touch comparisons?	YES	NO (Sharp didn't include Kevin Faulk as he only played for NE; & he didn't use Deion Branch, Ben Watson & Laurence Maroney pre-2007 Pat stats: Yet these stats are relevant for comparison sake)

[BluH2o]

NFL better tread carefully on this when the appeal comes through. Brady doesn’t need football, football needs Brady.

The Patriots have a history of cheating going back to Spygate in 2007. As far as Brady is concerned he needs football, it's who he is, and right now his image is tarnished. He quits and the big bucks go away, no network is going to hire him as a football analyst (if inclined to do so) and pay him the kind of money he's making with the Patriots.

[GotMojo]

Kraft’s reaction is pathetic.....he’s got a guy on his payroll calling himself “The Deflator”....enough said. Take your medicine and show some humility.

[wardaddy]

Very good post cherry

Nicely done

For many Freepers this is about Brady’s great time and their sorry one

Hey I lived in Bud Adams ghosts head so I can say that

Go Saints!

[fortheDeclaration]

He knew.

And he lied about knowing as well.

[fortheDeclaration]

The NFL doesn't have to prove guilt like in a criminal court, but guilt as in a civil court.

Every QB knows exactly what the weight of the football is he is using.

[fortheDeclaration]

Cheating is cheating and it must be dealt with.

Amazing how many 'conservatives' don't understand that.