Stanley Ann was not yet 19 when Hussein was supposedly born.
The law at the time was that a mother could transmit citizenship to her child only if she had lived five years in the U.S. after her 14th birthday. She had not.
Therefore, if Hussein was not born on U.S. soil, he was not a U.S. citizen at birth.
Regardless of this, he WAS a British Subject at birth. The White House website says so.
Since there is no evidence he was born on U.S. soil, there is no evidence he was a U.S. citizen at birth.
Since he became an Indonesian citizen, and has never been naturalized in the U.S., he is an illegal alien—no matter what his citizenship was at birth.
You are correct on all points...until the above.
Obama returned to the USA at the age of 10 and lived in country thereafter. If he was born an American citizen, he remained an American citizen. There was no need or him to be naturalized. Upon reaching his majority at the age of 18, he could've opted for Indonesian citizenship -- but, so far as we know, he did not.
Judicial rulings contradict your beliefs.
Purpura & Moran v Obama: New Jersey Administrative Law Judge Jeff S. Masin: “No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.” April 10, 2012
http://www.scribd.com/doc/88936737/2012-04-10-NJ-Purpura-Moran-v-Obama-Initial-Decision-of-ALJ-Masin-Apuzzo