Posted on 05/10/2015 9:18:45 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
Peter Boyles interviews Trevor Loudon.
??????????????
What do you expect Cruz to say?
You do realize he was born outside the US himself.
So if having a certificate to prove you were born in the US is a requirement to be president, Ted's not in very good shape himself.
His candidacy is only possible if the birth certificate question is a non-issue.
Yes very very sad.
“I think Ive asked you for some explanation of the SIX DIFFERENT TYPEWRITERS at least a dozen times.”
That’s strange, I don’t renember you asking me that question before but I’m happy to respond.
How would anyone know about the original hard copy’s typing when NOBODY has ever had the opportunity to examine the original document?
What has been commented on is the spacing of letters and the reprographic effects of Mixed Raster Content (MRC) compression in the production of layers in the digital reproduction of copies of the birth certificate.
If there is legitimate evidence of forgery, it would be a good idea (it would have been an even better idea eight years ago) to conduct a formal CRIMINAL grand jury investigation so that computer software experts and Forensic Document Examiners can be questioned about the birth certificate, under oath,
I have asked you the question before, and you gave me the same bullshit answer before.
According to you, it is impossible to tell whether a print-out of a digital scan or photo of a painting is of George Washington or Abraham Lincoln, just by looking at it.
The typefaces of different makes of typewriter differ considerably. The DESIGN of the letters is different.
The “birth certificate” has been proffered to the public as an IMAGE of a PAPER FORM filled out in 1961. On that form are the typefaces of six different typewriters.
It is inconceivable that any nurse or clerk ran around a hospital, sticking the form into six different typewriters—all of them different makes—to type individual words and even portions of words.
The “birth certificate” is a digitally-created fraud.
If everything you say is 100% true, why has there never been a grand jury or congressional investigation?
Last I heard, forgery, election fraud, identity theft and document altering are crimes. Since the alleged evidence is still posted on the whitehouse.gov web site and has been there since 2011, why no follow up on the charges?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.