[CaptainK]

Scrolling down the article to the comments section, it appears the children might not have been taken because of home schooling but because of dangerous living conditions.

I’m not sure which is the true scenario, but the article is vague on the facts.

[cuban leaf]

Scrolling down the article to the comments section, it appears the children might not have been taken because of home schooling but because of dangerous living conditions.

---

In this case I consider that a red herring, and the reason is simple. This is Kentucky. I moved here from Seattle four years ago and sometimes I think I’m gonna see Huck Finn himself come out of a house.

i.e. If this same government ever went to eastern Ky, they’d round up half the kids there, and because of much WORSE living conditions.

This is about people that the government can’t control, and there are enough of them now that the government is trying to set examples.

You oughta hear what they are doing regarding people trying to use and sell raw milk.

[BfloGuy]

it appears the children might not have been taken because of home schooling but because of dangerous living conditions

Sounds plausible. The article is dreadfully written -- perhaps on purpose.

[Moonman62]

Scrolling down the article to the comments section, it appears the children might not have been taken because of home schooling but because of dangerous living conditions.

I’m not sure which is the true scenario, but the article is vague on the facts.

...

There’s always two sides to the story.

[Shimmer1]

Yeah, so dangerous that the State couldn’t even get warrants or otherwise do this legally. They had to go in and kidnap those kids.