Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Unbelievable that such a bill would be seen as a necessity. But observe the reaction of the sodomite brownshirts: opponents say it opens the door to broader discrimination of same-sex couples and other groups.

May God judge this country swiftly and while protecting or removing the "10 righteous men" from that impact...

1 posted on 05/06/2015 7:26:50 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: markomalley

Would Catholic Priests be required to marry a gay couple.


2 posted on 05/06/2015 7:28:01 PM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

No minister of Christ will ever do a queer “Marriage”. Marriage is between a man and woman — not a man and a donkey or a man and another queer man or a pervert woman and another sick woman. You will see liars like queer “Churches “ do it which is blasphemy.


10 posted on 05/06/2015 7:44:37 PM PDT by iowacornman (Speak out with courage!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Sure the pastors can refuse, and even receive state protection, but the Feds will try to take away their tax exempt status and destroy them by taxing their income and properties.

Correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that the Catholic Church claims its tax exempt status as a free church without incorporating as a 5013c organization. However, most Protestant churches do not claim free church status.

Mass civil disobedience appears to be the most viable solution.


11 posted on 05/06/2015 7:45:20 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats & GOPe delenda est. U.S. Federal government = 1930s Nazi gov.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Only liberals get freedom of conscience. Conservatives must bow to the demands of liberals, ignore their own conscience and violate the laws of God. They exist only to make money that the liberals can confiscate to fund their own pet causes and programs that essentially benefit — wait for it — LIBERALS!


16 posted on 05/06/2015 7:55:31 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

They act a lot bigger than they really are.


17 posted on 05/06/2015 7:58:26 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

They don’t need a law made by men to protect them for doing God’s work.


18 posted on 05/06/2015 7:58:39 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The plain words of the First Amendment should make it clear what the rights of religious bodies are on this issue. The government might claim that churches are required to perform homosexual marriages on the basis of anti-discrimination. What government would really be doing is dictating religious doctrine and practice. No religious believer or member of the clergy worth their salt ought to put up with that. So any moves in that direction on the part of the government need to be disobeyed and resisted.


24 posted on 05/06/2015 8:05:14 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Lawyers are breaking our system.

Whatever happened to minority rights but MAJORITY RULES?

The MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE OF ALABAMA have ruled that they don’t want homosexual marriage.


26 posted on 05/06/2015 8:16:34 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson