You haven’t “explained” shit.
You offered an OPINION — and then changed the subject by throwing in a whole boatload of nonsense that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Baltimore matter.
IOW you’re a waste of time.
You offered an OPINION — and then changed the subject by throwing in a whole boatload of nonsense that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Baltimore matter.
IOW you’re a waste of time.
*****************************************************************************************************
Nervous, you might as well get used to it, “quibblers” will plague you on FR if you respond too much to their postings. It might not be the case now (e.g. post Obama inauguration) but it used to be that “quibblers” were not tolerated at West Point. I've given up “debating” the point and will just wait until the Agendanista Baltimore DA is finally forced by court action to allow the knife in question to be examined and, likely, litigated. Only then will we know for sure whether the knife is legal in Baltimore/Maryland for CARRY.
This is not an opinion. It is a fact.
A spring-assist knife, which the arresting officer wrote in his report is the type of knife recovered, is not a switch blade. It is, therefore, not illegal under the Code of the City of Baltimore as it is written.
This is not merely my "opinion". It is based on the wording of the law as posted on Baltimore's web-site, the arresting officer's written report, and the fundamental differences in design and operation between automatic opening knives (switch blades) and spring-assisted opening knives.