> We should be invading countries that make drugs for sale on US streets.
Afghanistan’s Opium production — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_production_in_Afghanistan — could be wiped out with a few nukes, it would also make a huge dent in the funding for international terrorism [IIUC]... there’s a reason we haven’t done this: the US government makes too much money off of the War on Drugs, it garners too much power from the War on Drugs, and the War on Terror, using the expedience of “now” to justify ignoring Constitutional constraints (such as the NSA’s domestic espionage).
> We should be shooting people who run meth labs on the spot.
...it’s funny how the “law and order”-types are the first to throw out the law and act like thugs when the law gets in the way of their dreams of utopia... heck, insofar as that is concerned there’s little difference between that and the leftist’s utopia-dreams.
You are literally cheering for giving [up] the power that will be used to destroy you.
You're proving my point. If we nuked Afghanistan's drug production, (and that of other drug producing nations) we would go a long way toward solving our problems with drugs and drug dealers.
You are literally cheering for giving [up] the power that will be used to destroy you.
No, because I'm not a drug dealer. I also support vigilante justice for drug dealers btw. I think a parent has every right to get his/her gun and blow away a dealer who sold to his kid.