It’s fun to bring up things the other person didn’t mention to then go and argue against the things that were never brought up by the person you want to aruge with.
I think it’s very clear. Hard core drug dealers. that are well known to law enforcement and probably most of the community they prey in. I doubt my clarification makes any difference to you anyway, so I wonder why you bring it up other than to attempt to denigrate.
As for your SPECULATION, it’s just that. You are the only one who’s equated books with drugs and then gone off to argue about that. Not me. You can keep arguing with yourself on that point.
Drug dealers are cancer on society. They destroy the very people they sell to and do not give two sh1ts about them. They don’t deal drugs because it’s a “freedom” thing. They do it for the effing money and everything else can go to hell. They are parasites. They are vermin. They sell stuff that they know is terrible for people and often add in crap to make it worse. They care nothing about their users. They care nothing about the families it harms. They care nothing about the costs to society that could be spent elsewhere that are directly and indirectly used up because of the tangible negative effects drugs have - at the individual level, family level, and community level.
They are scum. You know exactly the kind of person I ma describing. It’s not a vague broad definition. It’s a very specific definition, it’s the picture you picture in your head when you think of “hard core drug dealers”.
Don’t play the fool and don’t play me for a fool.
There was a time in the U.S. when there was no prohibition against drugs. Somehow we became the richest and most prosperous nation on earth.
No, it's not very clear — you said Exterminate all drug dealers On the spot
nothing there would indicate hard core
drug dealers and, in fact, the word all indicates universal quantification and it is therefore quite reasonable to take that to mean all drug dealers
.
As for your SPECULATION, it’s just that. You are the only one who’s equated books with drugs and then gone off to argue about that. Not me. You can keep arguing with yourself on that point.
Really, I seem to recall that the DEA raided a woman's house because she shopped at a gardening store — and that's even before your active summary execution idea would be put into effect. Is there some reason to think that making it easier for government agents to kill people would make government agents more reasonable?
Drug dealers are cancer on society. They destroy the very people they sell to and do not give two sh1ts about them.
And, by that evaluation, so are politicians.
I suspect that summary execution of politicians would have a far more overarching effect on society than a few measly drug dealers.
Don’t play the fool and don’t play me for a fool.
I'm not.
But you seem to have far too much trust in the people that would be acting in the name of the government to wield this power justly.