I think he has her in a catch-22.
A commenter at the site stated it this way:
“Gowdy has Clinton on the horns of a dilemma now. If she refuses to swear she turned over all relevant emails and she destroyed the server the legal presumption is cause for discovery and consequently she is guilty of tampering with evidence. If she swears under oath there were no more emails of relevance she admits that there were more emails just none relevant but this contradicts her representation who denied any more emails existed period in the other cases.
“The public doesn’t have to follow this logic. All they have to ask is why is Hillary unwilling to swear under oath what she insists is the truth and expects us to believe. Her attempt to demonize the Gowdy investigation collapses as well since he is being more than reasonable and gracious with his offer of respecting her word.
“She can’t agree or disagree with Gowdy - either way she hangs for prejury and/or tampering with evidence.”
So when is Gowdy going to call her to testify under oath?
Yeah right.
What crap.
She swears there are no more and Gowdy has to make good on his promise to take her at her word.
So clever!!
You and Gowdy are sold out.
LIARS.
VOTE CRUZ/PALIN
Exzactly, but try telling that to this thread of in and out justice demands, like it should be a McDonalds.
I love Trey, and considering who he is tackling he has very little to work with, but he’s capable of making lemonade.
Maybe, but the American people as a whole will always believe HRC no matter what. They have to believe her for their own peace of mind.