Posted on 04/29/2015 5:25:04 AM PDT by SJackson
What does the State Departments Wendy Sherman do with her spare time when not negotiating weak nuclear deals with rogue regimes? The same as the rest of the Obama foreign-policy team: threaten Israel with diplomatic isolation at the United Nations. Sherman issued some thinly veiled threats yesterday in remarks to a gathering of Reform movement leaders in which she made clear that the administration expects the next Israeli government to do its bidding with respect to supporting a two-state solution with the Palestinians. While theres nothing new about this insistence, Shermans language followed the same pattern as other remarks issued by U.S. officials since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was reelected last month. But like all such warnings that have been aimed at Jerusalem from Washington, the most striking aspect of this effort is how divorced these American staffers are from the reality of a peace process that the Palestinians have no interest in pursuing.
Sherman, who holds the title of Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, is best known for her work on nuclear non-proliferation in both the Clinton and Obama administrations. But her real claim to fame is as the person who naively gave away the store to the North Koreans that helped them get closer to a bomb in the 1990s and learned nothing from that experience before repeating the exercise in the last few years with Iran. She defended the Iran nuclear deal she helped negotiate and assured the Reform leaders that the pact would make Israel and the world safer. But that highly debatable conclusion is less newsworthy than Shermans effort to fire yet another shot over Netanyahus bow as he completed negotiations to form his next government.
According to the Times of Israel, Sherman warned that if the new government is seen as stepping back from its commitment to a two-state solution, that makes our job in the international arena that much tougher. She went on to note that the U.S. had repeatedly stood up against efforts to delegitimize Israel or single Israel out unfairly and that this would continue to be the case. But then she added that Netanyahus pre-election statements about the unlikelihood of a two-state solution happening had raised questions about the premise of U.S. support.
While Shermans remarks can be read in a sympathetic manner as being basically supportive of Israeland theres little doubt that her audience heard it that waythe message to Netanyahu was clear: any more wavering about his dedication to two-state negotiations and all bets are off in the United Nations.
But while Sherman is right when she says that most American Jews are as obsessed with willing a two-state solution into existence as the president and Secretary of State Kerry, Israelis take a different view of things.
Most of them would also like a two-state solution that would allow them to cease having responsibility for areas that are dominated by Palestinian Arabs. But unlike the Obama administration and its American Jewish cheering section on the left, the majority of Israeli voters have paid attention to events in the region in the last 20 years and know that they dont have a viable Palestinian peace partner. It doesnt matter whether most Israelis share the conviction that two states for two peoples is the best possible solution to the conflict. That happens to be the case, but Israelis also understood what Netanyahu was talking about the day before his stunning election victory when he said that creating a Palestinian state in the West Bank under current circumstances was an invitation to a new round of terrorist attacks on Israel.
Israelis remember what happened when their government withdrew every last soldier and settler from Gaza in 2005. Instead of trading land for peace as they hoped (and as they had vainly attempted to do with the Oslo Accords), they wound up trading land for terror. Indeed, for all the talk about the necessity of creating a Palestinian state, what Israelis understand is that the Hamas-run strip is for all intents and purposes an independent Palestinian state. The notion of repeating this experiment in the far larger and more strategic West Bank strikes most Israelis, whether they voted for Likud and its allies or Netanyahus main opponents, the Labor-led Zionist Union, as nuts. A two-state solution wasnt in the cards no matter who had won the Israeli election and it wont be brought any closer or pushed off any further into the future no matter what Netanyahu says about the idea.
Thats been the basic problem with Obama administration Middle East policy since 2009. The president came into office obsessed with the notion that more distance between Israel and the United States would tempt the Palestinians to negotiate seriously. Hes gotten the distance he wanted and then some, but the Palestinians have never budged. Theyre still refusing to recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state no matter where its borders are drawn. Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas has no real interest in being drawn into more talks where hes faced with the choice of either saying no to peace (which he and his predecessor Yasir Arafat have repeatedly done even when a Palestinian state was offered the by the Israelis) or agreeing to something his people wont accept. Hamas, backed up by an Iranian ally that has been empowered and embraced by Obama, exercises an effective veto on peace even if Abbas were willing or capable of signing a deal.
But that doesnt stop the president from sending Sherman to intimate that if the Israelis dont bow to his dictates the U.S. will no longer veto resolutions recognizing Palestinian independence without first forcing them to make peace with Israel. Clearly, thats the direction toward which the lame duck administration is moving despite the recent talk of a Jewish charm offensive intended to disarm criticism of the presidents clear animus against the Israeli government. In the absence of significant pushback from a Democratic Party that is still in thrall to Obama, we may find out in the next 23 months whether Obama is bluffing.
Maybe 0bama is a larger existential threat to Israel than Iran.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
I hope Israel puts Zero in time-out. Putz.
Another year-and-a-half of America’s Idiot-in-Chief.
Wendy Sherman FAILED in her negotiations with the North Koreans.
Wendy Sherman was therefore promoted at State.
Wendy Sherman FAILED AGAIN in her negotiations with the Iranians.
This administration as well as Clinton's administration were proud of a job not well done.
Wendy Sherman is a Jew so...let her enable Israel's No. 1 enemy to get the bomb! Yes! A Jew f___ing over the Jewish State! It's brilliant! Obama & Co. are brilliant and the Iranians are loving every minute of it.
Wendy Sherman has now been given a new task, HARRASS her fellow Jews in Israel until they capitulate and die!
“State Departments Wendy Sherman”
All my indicators show she is a self hating Jew from the left wing and has been at it quite a while http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/174931.htm
How do you know she (Wendy Sherman) is Jewish/////// Though it seems like this to me too.
We hope........
Here is a full accounting of the Jews in the Jew ridden State Department>>>
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=800
Not that it doers Israel any good :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.