Good article but serves to illustrate the author is susceptible to ‘fads’ except in this case he sees ‘the fruit’ which is social tyranny.
The author really doesn’t get it.
The issue here isn’t same sex marriage. It’s how opposition to same sex marriage can be used to justify the utter destruction of anyone holding that view.
The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution. If it wasn’t same sex marriage it would be something else.
Heck, in recent weeks I’ve seen, on social media, people espousing the view that “I support gay marriage but I think people who don’t support it shouldn’t be forced to bake cakes (etc)” get visciously attacked and threatened.