Posted on 04/23/2015 7:40:40 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
At Accuracy in Academia, we have long complained of academic historians who ignore primary sources in favor of secondary ones. What gets lost in that process from the former approach to the latter one is, well, history.
Never have I found myself tripping over a professor at the Library of Congress in 30 years as a regular there. In an article which appeared on the academe blog maintained by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), Peter N. Kirstein helpfully shows us part of the origin of this revisionist history. Kirstein himself is a professor of history at Saint Xavier University in Chicago.
“Two of America’s greatest historians of the postwar period were Richard Hofstadter and Howard Zinn,” Kirstein avers. “Like Dewey they had a strong Columbia connection.”
“Hofstadter taught at Columbia from 1946 to 1970, and chaired Howard Zinn’s dissertation-defense committee. Both were revisionist historians who preferred synthesizing secondary sources over mining archival documents. The claim that only primary sources constitute the gold standard of historiography is undermined by the Hofstadter-Zinn mode of discovery of a new past, thereby creating a more enlightened present. Historiography relying upon printed sources or readily available primary sources can be quite effective in liberation from the predominant accepted discourse on essential matters of national identity and purpose. The towering histories of Hofstadter’s, The American Political Tradition: And the Men Who Made It, The Paranoid Style of American Politics, and Anti-Intellectualism in American Life and Dr. Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States, Postwar America: 1945-1971 and Vietnam: The Logic of Withdrawal are examples of a searing revisionism that discovers a new American past freed from nationalistic hagiography.”
Avoiding primary sources is certainly something that both of these celebrated historians were good at. Zinn, as we have noted, apparently bypassed the Bureau of Labor Statistics when he claimed that unemployment grew during the Reagan years. Hofstadter managed to write a lengthy chapter on Abraham Lincoln in one of his still widely used texts that did not mention the Gettysburg address.
“When the legend becomes fact, print the legend,” the newspaper editor intones in John Ford’s classic film The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. Unfortunately, Zinn and Hofstadter have printed many legends which masquerade as factual history and are still fed to college students as such, and they are misled by them.
Moreover, academic presses continue to churn out histories in the Zinn/Hofstadter motif written by academics who lionize the two of them.
Thank you, LL
Their both trash! Isn’t Howard Zinn the big idol of that actor, Ben Affleck?
That was Matt Damon in “Good Will Hunting” promoting Howard Zinn. Damon grew up living next door to Zinn. Damon is a decent actor (good at faking emotions), but is totally brainwashed in Progressivism.
YUP. I knew it was one of them.
let’s put it this way. The Daily Worker is a secondary source
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
