Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exposing the Marxist/Communist Past of Hillary Clinton
America Resists ^ | 4/16/2015 | Leon Puissegur

Posted on 04/18/2015 2:52:27 PM PDT by HomerBohn

I left off on the last article with how Hillary Rodham Clinton wants a revolutionary change and the building of a new society founded on Marxist principles. Hillary Rodham Clinton is an evil individual who has been taught that the United States has to change to a more Socialistic/Marxist way. She was against the Vietnam War and led protests against it, showing her disregard for the military and what they were doing to try and hold Communism at bay in Vietnam. That did not matter to Hillary at all; her ideas were more like Stalin and Hitler than any of our ideas of the United States.

“ Hillary served as one of nine editors of the Yale Review of Law and Social Action, where she worked collaboratively with Mickey Kantor (who, more than two decades later, would serve as U.S. Trade Representative and U.S. Commerce Secretary under President Bill Clinton) and Robert Reich (who would serve as Bill Clinton’s Labor Secretary from 1993 to 1997). “For too long,” said the Yale Review, “legal issues have been defined and discussed in terms of academic doctrine rather than strategies for social change.” The publication was replete with articles by or about such radicals as William Kunstler, Charles Reich (author of The Greening of America); Jerry Rubin (who wrote a piece exhorting parents to “get high with our seven-year-olds,” and urging students to “kill our parents”); and Charles Garry (the civil rights attorney who defended Black Panther Party members accused of murder). The Fall and Winter 1970 editions of the Yale Review, on which Hillary worked as associate editor, focused heavily on the trials of Black Panthers who had been charged with murder. Numerous cartoons in those issues depicted police officers as hominid pigs.[3]

[3] Ibid., pp. 59-61. Barbara Olson, Hell to Pay (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1999), pp. 59-59 Ibid., pp. 59-61.

Hillary Rodham Clinton had a Yale professor named Thomas Emerson (known as “Tommy the Commie”), who introduced her to Charles Gary, and this is where it got really interesting, as she got personally involved with the defense of several Black Panthers who tortured an individual with boiling water, mutilated one of their own members, and committed other horrendous acts.

“ Though evidence of the defendants’ guilt was overwhelming, Hillary — as part of her coursework for Professor Emerson — attended the Panther trials and arranged for shifts of fellow students to likewise monitor court proceedings and report on any civil-rights abuses allegedly suffered by the defendants. (Those abuses could then be used, if the Panthers were to lose their case, as grounds for appeal.) Striving to neutralize what she considered the pervasive racism of the American legal system, “Hillary was,” as Barbara Olson observed in Hell to Pay, “a budding Leninist.”

Hillary left college being described as a budding Leninist, her ideology in line with the Communist party. Why would the United Sates want to have Hillary Rodham Clinton as the President of the United States when, according to her learning, the United States had to change from a free society into a Marxist or Communist society?

But it does get worse—much worse. As Hillary Rodham Clinton moved on through her college days, she became more aligned with the ideology that the United States was not good for her ideas or those of her mentors, one of whom she held a high regard (Saul Alinsky).

To show how much she despised the United States involvement in the Vietnam War, Hillary Rodham Clinton did the following:

“ In 1970, Hillary chaired a meeting where Yale Law School students voted in favor of joining a national strike against the Vietnam War.

Hillary Rodham Clinton would not feel very favorable towards the Vietnam veterans, and would not make a good commander in chief with this type of background. She also made sure some Veterans would be able to file as conscientious objectors. Hillary Rodham Clinton did this while working for the communist law firm to show where her heart really was.

“ Also in 1972, she went to Berkeley to work as an intern at her hand-picked law firm: Treuhaft, Walker, and Bernstein. Founded by current or former members of the Communist Party USA, this firm had long acted as a legal asset not only for the CPUSA but also for the Black Panthers and other Bay-area radicals. Founding partner Bob Treuhaft, head of the California Communist Party, had been labeled one of the nation’s most dangerously subversive lawyers. According to historian Stephen Schwartz, “Treuhaft is a man who dedicated his entire legal career to advancing the agenda of the Soviet Communist Party and the KGB.” Hillary did yeoman’s work while learning at the feet of Treuhaft and his fellow masters. Associates say that Hillary, during her tenure with the firm, helped draftees get themselves declared conscientious objectors so they could avoid serving in Vietnam; they also contend that Hillary served VA interns seeking to avoid taking a loyalty oath to the United States.

Also in the early 1970s, Hillary developed a close acquaintanceship with Robert Borosage, who would later become a major figure in such leftist organizations as the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), the Campaign for America’s Future, and Institute for America’s Future. Hillary herself (along with Bill Clinton) would go on to develop close political ties with IPS; moreover, she would give that organization a great deal of money to further its cause.

Hillary Rodham Clinton did, in fact, get involved with some of the most left leaning groups out there, some even being considered as Communist front groups. In the 1970s, she began spreading her ideas that women, children, and minorities were being shunned by a white male-driven society.

“ Viewing America as an authoritarian, patriarchal, male-dominated society that tended to oppress women, children, and minorities, Hillary wrote a November 1973 article for the Harvard Educational Review advocating the liberation of children from “the empire of the father.” She claimed that the traditional nuclear family structure often undermined the best interests of children, who “consequently need social institutions specifically designed to safeguard their position.” “Along with the family,” she elaborated, “past and present examples of such arrangements include marriage, slavery, and the Indian Reservation system.” She added: “Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal disease, or employment, and others where the decision or lack of one will significantly affect a child’s future should not be made unilaterally by parents.”

In today’s society, what Hillary Rodham Clinton stated back in 1973 seems like exactly what she states today. She calls for, “the liberation of children from the empire of the father.” Maybe this is why our families are falling apart today—because ideas like those of Hillary Rodham Clinton wish to demean the father figure in the home and make him seem like a ruling king? Hillary Rodham Clinton sounded like a pure Communist back then, and it would not seem too unrealistic to think she harbors those same ideas today.

But Hillary Rodham Clinton has not come to be on her own—she has had a lot of help and, in some cases, questionable placements to high positions. Take, for instance, her 1976 time when she got moved up the ladder only due to her then husband, Bill Clinton.

“ In 1976 Mrs. Clinton worked for Jimmy Carter‘s successful presidential campaign. Soon thereafter, she found employment as an attorney with the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, where she would continue to work until 1992. According to political analyst and former Clinton advisor Dick Morris, “She [Hillary] had no job offers in Arkansas and only got hired by the University of Arkansas Law School at Fayetteville because Bill was already teaching there. She only joined the prestigious Rose Law Firm after Bill became Attorney General, and made partner only after he was elected governor.”

In the next article I will show a lot more of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s past and how it came to be under some very interesting circumstances. I may feature a 4th article to show her dealings with the many scandals surrounding her.

In closing, I have to express that, as Hillary Rodham Clinton’s past is disclosed, it will be shown that she is a much worse individual than Obama, as she did not hide her past, and that alone shows Hillary Rodham Clinton to be much more of a Communist extreme left individual than even Obama is.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bitchofkosovo; clinton; hillary; hitleryrottenham; whoshotvince
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: HomerBohn

Why is it that every dirtbrained idea coming out of the mouth of Hillary Clinton or Barack 0bama has to begin with “For too long we have been...”

Think about the implication(s) of prefacing most of ones statement like that. Oh sure, nothing’s perfect and there are plenty of things that could stand upgrading or correcting and there always have been and there always be. But for me to consistently accept that statement out of [your] mouth means I accept you as a leader, an innovator, a savior. One who has this special knowledge of just how screwed up we are. As we see on an ongoing basis, the replacement ideas are substanceless. They are in fact acts of vandalism against our republic which is a million times greater than the likes of 0bama and Clinton.

This preparatory phrase is stated in front of every damn thing 0bama has said. It is utopian, it is one of those phrases that forces you, the listener, to presuppose that he is possessed of the superior idea, whether moral or societal or economic. It’s always the big idea with these two. We have to listen these rabble-rousers, you see. Nobody has the right to any sort of inherent optimism without the input of these two savior figures. The truth is that they are vultures who would sooner feast on the dying corpse of a nation they are working to degrade. Under the idea of course, that everything about America stinks and will forever stink unless they get the chance to change it around to their ways of thinking. Hillary is clumsily attempting to co-opt this rabble-rouser community organizer thing with this phrasing. She fails miserably in my mind but nobdy should forget the imposing electoral advantage dems have and the idea that 40+% of the electorate would vote for a Hillary Clinton no matter what.

Not content with the damage they have already done, the degradation of so many things, they are never satisfied nor willing to step off that infinitely wise moral pedestal they and only they construct for themselves. The folks who would listen and pay attention to these admonitions and scoldings are in fact people who have nothing or believe they have nothing. Indeed, most resent the injustices they perceive and automatically wish to elevate themselves onto the synthetic pedestal of superiority 0bama is so adept at creating in peoples minds. In 0bama’s case, he has this pattern of moving to new topic, having a coffee meeting with some close advisors, issuing an executive order, and he’s on to the next thing. It’s just one shiny object after another. He’s always got the better way. If only people would listen.

Prior to the election of Barack 0bama, “for too long” we had a system of laws that was by and large followed. His “big ideas” are all contrary to same. We had a nation where despite isolated instances of racism, the overwhelming majority of people got along inter-racially. He’s set race relations back at least 60 years, and there is no end in sight to the unending picking at this scab. Don’t smart people allow scabs to heal? And it’s been such a hell of a slog these last 6 years, with little or nothing to show for it.


21 posted on 04/18/2015 3:36:32 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck
Separated at birth????


22 posted on 04/18/2015 3:43:03 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I can hear the music now..

Don’t stop believing

Yesterday is gone

Fleetwood Mac :-)

Perfect for Hillary

Brain Eraser for the masses


23 posted on 04/18/2015 3:49:02 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

She’s descended of Mo’Revengian blood yaknow.

Her exploits are well known worldwide.

She’s been dang near everywhere..

Except back in the Oval Orifice Pleasure Chair.

Its her destiny, yaknow..


24 posted on 04/18/2015 3:52:35 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

BTTT


25 posted on 04/18/2015 4:10:00 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("The hour has arrived to gather the Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smellin Salt

But she’s a woman and we need a woman president! Remember - it’s symbolic.


26 posted on 04/18/2015 4:10:46 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Opposing the VIetnam wasr did not and soes not make you a communist. That’s a garnage argument and has no bearing on whether she is marxist or not. I was in regular army from 1967 to 197l. Most of the troops I knew were opposed to the war for one reason or another. When I put in request for Vietnam my first short told me I didn’t want to do that.


27 posted on 04/18/2015 4:12:26 PM PDT by pacific_waters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

All ancient history! Already dealt with! Right, Ambassador Stevens? Oh, whoops...


28 posted on 04/18/2015 4:13:50 PM PDT by Yaelle ("You're gonna fly away, Glad you're going my way..." - Smokey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Excellent. Excellent.


29 posted on 04/18/2015 4:18:29 PM PDT by Yaelle ("You're gonna fly away, Glad you're going my way..." - Smokey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn


30 posted on 04/18/2015 4:49:36 PM PDT by Iron Munro (It IS as BAD as you think and they ARE out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Chad & Jeremy: I loved you yesterday, but yesterday’s gone....


31 posted on 04/18/2015 5:05:01 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Question #7

Who said:

“Come on Bill, put your **** up. You can’t **** her here.”

A. Vince Foster
B. Ron Brown
C. Bill Shelton
D. Ed Wiley
E. John Wilson
F. Paul Wilcher
G. Webb Hubbell
H. Gennifer Flowers
I. Monica Lewinski
J. None of the above


32 posted on 04/18/2015 5:07:56 PM PDT by Iron Munro (It IS as BAD as you think and they ARE out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

I think it was Hillary.


33 posted on 04/18/2015 5:11:59 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sport
I think it was Hillary.


34 posted on 04/18/2015 5:36:40 PM PDT by Iron Munro (It IS as BAD as you think and they ARE out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

Obama, with his already heavy baggage of Marxism and Islamism, found in Saul Alinsky’s ”Rules for Radicals” the way for the fulfillment of the dreams and the megalomaniac ambitions of his totalitarian sociopathic mind. But before Obama, Hillary drunk the poisonous waters of the Alinskism, she was the right hand of the Marxist prophet who preached the rules for the conquest of the power in U.S. by the Communists.


35 posted on 04/18/2015 9:21:38 PM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

Other than the money aspect, it was Bill and Hill’s Third Way (communist) philosophy that allowed them to sell every US secret they could lay their paws on to the Chinese.


36 posted on 04/19/2015 3:50:05 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson