I pray that we do not become like the Liberal, Left-Wing radicals who attack anyone who presents the case that their candidate is a less than desirable candidate.How did I attack you? I said "baloney" to your statement that Walker was mushy. I implored you to tout your own candidate without attacking a candidate that I believe has stood incredibly tall against the combined forces of socialism and liberalism. How is that attacking you? That is merely defending a fellow conservative who has been laying it on the line where it really matters in the trenches. I like Cruz, but there is an incredibly vast difference between being a conservative senator in a deliberative body and being a conservative executive in a blue state. Must we light a candle for you to see the sun?
First of all: I not only addressed my comment to you, but to “All”. Read some of the mean-spirited comments by the Walker supporters on this thread. Secondly:.........
Go back and read your Post #31: You accused me of throwing Scott Walker “under the bus” because I simply stated some facts. That’s the way the Alinsky, liberal radicals operate. Rather than address the issues, just accuse (attack) those they oppose. You made NO EFFORT to disprove my concerns that were listed in the article link that I posted; you just came at me with your claws out. Your accusation against me was an attack; and, an unjust one at that. Because you see flaws in a candidate that could result in a General Election loss and bring them up, does not mean I am throwing him “under the bus”. Read the first few lines of Post #54 to you. I think Walker is a good man, he just needs to determine what his convictions are, stand for them and quit flip-flopping.
No, you don’t need to light a candle for me to see the sun. You just need to be and adult and address the issues rather than shooting the messenger.