Soros owns McCain
Posted on 04/14/2015 6:21:36 PM PDT by Coronal
PHOENIX -- Gov. Doug Ducey vetoed legislation Monday that would have allowed county attorneys to refuse to help with adoptions, setting the stage for a legal fight over whether gays have the same right to assistance as heterosexuals.
(Excerpt) Read more at eastvalleytribune.com ...
This will doubtless unleash a bunch of “Obamathugs” on AZ for the 50th time....
Look a little closer at the article.
Thanks for the nudge.
Soros owns McCain
No child should be in the presence of faggotry. It is an abominable sight and child abuse beyond comprehension. That is why it was illegal for a 1000 years and should be now but we have fallen into the pit.
Yep. Thick as thieves.
uh....we also “have the right” NOT to participate in the honeymoon!!!!
Meaning...
I don’t give a damn what THEIR “rights” are!!!
I HAVE THE RIGHT NOT TO PARTICIPATE!!!!
What is the purpose for marriage?
The purpose of marriage is ultimately to glorify God since He tells us He made us for His glory (Isaiah 43:7). Marriage is the covenant union of a man and a woman for the purpose of committing to each other in companionship, provision of food and shelter, sexual privileges, children, and protection.
Homosexuals “do not” have children nor do they procreate.
Therefore Homo’s should not have the right to adopt children.
Tsk, tsk. Don’t want to get the fat cats at Wal-Mart upset.
"But because Arizona did not recognize same-sex marriages, the other woman was not considered a parent. ..."
Regardless that the corrupt media wants everybody to think that the Supreme Court found the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional, Section 2 of DOMA is still in effect and protects Arizona law not to recognize gay marriages from other states.
DOMA:
This Act may be cited as the “Defense of Marriage Act”.
No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
Also, the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay agenda issues. And Section 1 of the 14th Amendment (14A) applies only those rights expressly amended to the Constitution by the states to the states. So there are no constitutionally enumerated gay protections for the feds to apply to the states via 14A to prohibit the states from making laws and policies which discriminate against constitutionally unprotected gay issues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.