Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

Where is Congress in this investigation? Darrell Issaa? Why does it take Judicial Watch to get this out?


9 posted on 04/13/2015 5:23:23 PM PDT by Fungi (So you think you know anything about evolution? Think again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fungi

Where is Congress in this investigation? Darrell Issaa? “”

Doing every thing humanly possible to COVER IT ALL UP, ISSA AND GOWDY ARE COMPLICIT in all of this, as is The entire leadership of BOTH Parties, including Juan McCain.

Appearing before CONGRESS you have NO RIGHTS, You have the right to answer truthfully, that is all, you HAVE NO RIGHT against Self Incrimination, You Have NO RIGHT to say no, YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS AT ALL BEFORE CONGRESS, those are for the Judicial Branch of Government.

They dont have to, CONGRESS can do it on their Own!!

Congress has ALL the power in washington, the executive and judicial branch operate according to the whims of CONGRESS!

Congress can Remove the President
Congress can remove the head of every executive agency
Congress can remove ALL of their employees
Congress can Abolish every agency they so choose
Congress can remove EVERY JUDGE IN AMERICA, including every supreme court justice.
Congress can abolish every federal court except the supreme Court
Congress can decide which cases the Judicial Branch can hear and decide
CONGRESS can Imprison ANYONE they want for any reason they so desire for as long as they wish.
Congress can declare WAR

No other governing body has even 10% of the power CONGRESS has!!

CONGRESS IS ALLOWING ALL OF IT!!!

Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)

If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.

Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.

Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.

Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.

Some references

[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html

[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.”
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html

[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html
73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934)
https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit

[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear.
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html

[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf

[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement
http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/


39 posted on 04/13/2015 6:47:11 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Fungi

because it would force them to do something they have a direct aversion to and that is enforcing the law. enforcing the law and prosecuting anyone in washington dc seems to be the furthermost things from their mind all of them are in a perpetual reelection mode so that makes them unable to do their jobs effectively. they don’t care about the country especially if it means doing anything to protect their cushy jobs. that is the reason they want to take obama to court instead of standing up and bringing articles of impeachment against him. the constitution gives them every power they need to do what needs to be done but they refuse to do it due to their fear of not being voted back in. anyone of the bums that has served more than 2 terms should be gone period i don’t care how well anyone likes them after 2 terms they are getting to comfortable slopping it up at the public trough.


49 posted on 04/14/2015 6:08:40 AM PDT by awatson72752
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson