Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wjcsux

Lt. Col. Matthew A. Dooley had the right idea about islam , a full blown war on islam,

from a preservation of his

Some actions offered for consideration here will be seen as not “politically correct” in the
eyes of many, both inside and outside the United States (Examples: . Decision Points
considered in PH Ill where Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation, Mecca and Medina
destroyed. Islam reduced to cult status).

This model presumes Geneva Convention IV 1949 standards of armed conflict and the
pursuant UN endorsements of it are now, due to the current common practices of Islamic
terrorists, no longer relevant or respected globally. This would leave open the option once
again of taking war to a civilian population wherever necessary (the historical precedents of
Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki being applicable to the Mecca and Medina destruction
DP in Phase Ill)

http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/joint_staff/jointStaff_jointOperations/13-F-0117_DOC_04-course-materials-perspectives-on-Islam_and_Islamic_radicalism.pdf


26 posted on 04/11/2015 7:59:21 PM PDT by The Right wing Infidel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: The Right wing Infidel

also

This model calls for direct ideological and philosophical confrontation with Islam…this model asserts Islam has already declared war on the West, and the United States specifically, as is demonstrable with over 30 years of violent history. It is, therefore, illogical to continue along our current global strategy models that presume there are always possible options for common ground and détente with the Muslim Umma without waging near “total war”.


28 posted on 04/11/2015 8:04:58 PM PDT by The Right wing Infidel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson