Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul Really Infuriated Me This Week
Townhall.com ^ | April 11, 2015 | Michael Hausam

Posted on 04/11/2015 4:46:32 PM PDT by Kaslin

Although I'm extremely excited for the 2016 election even without having a particular GOP candidate in mind as my hoped-for annihilator of Hillary Rodham, Rand Paul really ticked me off this week. I mean REALLY ticked me off.

It looks like he is not going to play ball with the press. And that's a huge mistake.

So what happened?

He tussled with Savannah Guthrie, the 'Today' host, over her editorializing rather than simply questioning him. She was pressing him on whether or not he'd changed opinions on foreign aid to Israel and he not only objected to her talking over him and rendering an opinion in the process, he also gave her a suggestion as to how better to interview him.

He also had a couple of irritation-revealing interactions with journalists over questions about abortion. In both cases, the journalists were unhappy with the way Paul responded and Paul was even more unhappy with their reactions to that.

He even had the temerity to question the assumptions behind the interviewer's abortion question, saying:

“Here’s the deal — we always seem to have the debate waaaaay over here on what are the exact details of exemptions, or when it starts. Why don’t we ask the DNC: Is it okay to kill a seven-pound baby in the uterus? You go back and you ask Debbie Wasserman-Schultz if she’s okay with killing a seven-pound baby that is not born yet. Ask her when life begins, and you ask Debbie when it’s okay to protect life. When you get an answer from Debbie, get back to me.”

It was as if he didn't even respect their importance and influence enough to respond the way they wanted. How in the world can he expect to win their approval that way?

He attempted to explain himself several times, firstly to Wolf Blitzer in a television interview on CNN, then to Megyn Kelly on Fox News, and finally on Mark Levin's radio show, by acknowledging that he does get short-tempered and doesn't like it when simple direct questions aren't asked of him. He even went further on Levin's show, stating that he (and other conservatives) get tough questions whereas people like Hillary get asked how their vacations were or if they recalled being at a party together in the Hamptons.

What a strategic error he is making.

Doesn't he understand that pleasing the media should be his number one priority? Being someone they like and with whom they agree is the way to get the "What's your favorite color?" questions. Maintaining principle and attempting to dictate the rules of the game may please the masses and scratch an itch conservatives have had for years, but it certainly won't win friends and influence MSNBC people. And how else will he win their votes?

There are lessons that can be learned from the past and he'd do very well to study them.

Imagine, for a moment, had Mitt Romney spent time wooing and gaining the approval of Candy Crowley. Would she have been so energetic in her defense of President Obama during their debate? Perhaps she'd not have incorrectly opined in the middle of their discussion and that could've made a difference in the election.

Consider if John McCain had made a sufficient impression on Chris Matthews so that even an inspiring speech by Barack Obama wouldn't have sent a thrill up his leg. Would Matthews have spent so many countless hours beating the drum in support of the President had Republicans spent more time being what Matthews wanted them to be? It might be a completely different political world.

One might consider thinking it would be wise to directly fight to the media. But that would require recognizing they're as much of a political opposition to conservatives as are liberals and Democrats. Before going down that lonely road, it would have to be realized that such an approach won't get you invited to Andrea Mitchell's cocktail party or a big thumbs up from Rachel Maddow. And that would be a tragedy, wouldn't it?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abortion; enemedia; iran; israel; media; randpaul; savannahguthrie; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Kaslin

BS. with what the media threw in diabolical wickedry reminiscent of seething pharisees, Rand did excelent in my book.


41 posted on 04/11/2015 5:39:33 PM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

Cruz doesn’t get rattled and does handle the media well. I did hear him a few months back give the Cuomo clown on CNN a well deserved spanking.

Newt was excellent at handling the media, too. He had his own technique, more abrasive than Cruz’s. Rand’s approach is more like Newt’s than Ted’s.

Whatever their personal styles, Cruz, Paul, and Gingrinch have done a real service not backing down to the Dim media.


42 posted on 04/11/2015 5:44:35 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bookmark


43 posted on 04/11/2015 5:45:00 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

You can settle. Stop being so stupid. We can maybe but he needs our support also. Learn the one thing the Democrats do right. They support the people that can run and DO NOT TELL ME HE CAN’T WIN. That is bull s^&t.


44 posted on 04/11/2015 5:51:47 PM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
"...pleasing the media should be his number one priority..." and actually meaning it.

The author doesn't mean it. Put on these glasses (pulls a set of decoder glasses from his pocket and proffers them).

It's actually a pretty funny piece because it isolates that very assumption in order to spatter it with derisive laughter (ours). The delicious part is that 1) Liberals and RINOs won't quite get it, since they believe that's really the number-one priority, but notice that it looks naked and silly stated so simply; and 2) Conservatives get to snigger at the self-importance of the pseudo-journalists, who think they are the real story of this election, and of American and possibly world history.

45 posted on 04/11/2015 5:52:55 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98

I can’t believe it took 11 posts to figure that out.
/s


46 posted on 04/11/2015 5:55:49 PM PDT by Eddie01 (Liberals lie about everything all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
He is a politician and our experience should tell us to be a bit skeptical towards those people. They are great with words but slim on deeds.

So you expect someone to run for President of the United States that is NOT a politician? Good luck with that. Have a nice evening.

47 posted on 04/11/2015 6:02:38 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m INFURIATED too with Rand Paul. Particularly when he calls for a huge PRISONER RELEASE and essentially calls conservatives that support Voter ID RACISTS.

So me and this reporter are in the same boat.


48 posted on 04/11/2015 6:04:57 PM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my home page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

I do like it that both he and his father are pro-life, so many libertarians aren’t. And the dad is an obstetrician, isn’t he?


49 posted on 04/11/2015 6:05:17 PM PDT by jocon307 (Tell it like it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

No, I don’t act that way. He may very well be aware of their biases but as he stated in real time during the interview, at the very least he should have the reasonable expectation of being asked a question and given a chance to answer. As before, Guthrie was off on her own little monologue which, whatever our opinion of her and/or Paul, was not the purpose of his appearance.

A categorical term such as ‘forced’ ignores the reality of the situation i.e. any presidential candidate is going to have to interact with the press including the major networks. ‘Get out of the kitchen’ may be an appealing cliche but it’s hardly a media strategy that will carry him through the next 18 months.


50 posted on 04/11/2015 6:07:40 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Oh, and that he calls us neo-cons. That’s a slur and a veiled anti-Semitic one too.


51 posted on 04/11/2015 6:16:32 PM PDT by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

Candidates have been successful at outing the liberal press. Usually it is done with humor but sometimes with confrontation. Laughing and saying to Guthrie “that was a great DNC editorial” before jumping in addressing all her charges, would have been more effective than the snippiness Rand walked into. Rand’s personality is snippy and without great wit. He’s not much of a showman.

Remember when Reagan laughed and said “There ya go again” to a liberal during the debate and he made the whole audience laugh? I saw a clip of it on youtube. It was great.


52 posted on 04/11/2015 6:22:55 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: relictele

Paul should take some anger management classes

And do a better job who he interviews with, for starters.


53 posted on 04/11/2015 6:25:31 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
B T T T ! ! ! ©

54 posted on 04/11/2015 7:07:38 PM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! God bless you all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I want a Republican to just once respond with a question like: “Didn’t President Obama change his mind on gay marriage”? Didn’t he change his mind on Executive Orders?”.


55 posted on 04/11/2015 7:15:36 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miserare

I agree, that’s why Ted Cruz shows amatures how to deal with the media...


56 posted on 04/11/2015 7:16:12 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (BeThe Keystone Pipe like Project : build it already Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: relictele

Democrats demand a list of questions a head of time. Democrats demand that they will have the final say on any questions and “answers”.

It is going to brutal campaign for Republicans with the media. Hillary will of course, be able to charm and make them giggle, as she eats the heart out of a small child on stage.


57 posted on 04/11/2015 7:18:28 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98
Yes, it's sarcasm. Read the last line of the article.

I really like the aggressive approach. Call out all the Democrat suck-ups in the media, and refuse to answer them until their questions are really questions rather than Democrat talking points.

58 posted on 04/11/2015 8:38:45 PM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It was as if he didn't even respect their importance and influence enough to respond the way they wanted. How in the world can he expect to win their approval that way?

This is an absurd expectation. There are only two responses the press want from Paul: either one that gives the press means to destroy him or one that caves to the Democrat position. So what does this idiot expect?

59 posted on 04/11/2015 9:34:25 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Jesus man, don’t you have something real to worry about? Like another Democrat like Clinton in the White House?

The Republicans biggest problem isn’t the ideologically vacant Democrats they run against (because they CAN be beaten), but pointing the cannons straight down, at their own keel rather than the enemy ship (dems)...

Who is the real enemy here??


60 posted on 04/12/2015 8:19:16 AM PDT by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson